From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 08/32] drm/nouveau: use system_wq instead of dev_priv->wq Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:41:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20110201104135.GI14211@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294062595-30097-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294189627.2276.0.camel@nisroch> <1294190172.2276.2.camel@nisroch> <20110106172922.GA29580@mtj.dyndns.org> <20110126164918.GQ12520@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110126164918.GQ12520@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Skeggs Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 05:49:18PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue. > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead. Each work item is sync > flushed when the containing structure is unregistered/destroyed. > > Note that this change also makes sure that nv50_gpio_handler is not > freed while the contained work item is still running. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Cc: David Airlie > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Ping. Can you please put this through the drm tree? Thank you. -- tejun