From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.39-rc3
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:06:41 +0200
Message-ID: <20110415190641.GA20770@elte.hu>
References: <BANLkTik7W0u92n_s0t32dsoLULu4QTZneA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DA6145D.9070703@kernel.org>
 <BANLkTinud+4nUkZtnYRrU_gAFaMDWRa_AA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DA655E7.3000904@zytor.com>
 <BANLkTimqR_M5keMqr5WAuz-t+1BkCZbwCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTincU4rM+SqhzGOK_Rgxgg8fqJOOdQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110415131152.GJ18463@8bytes.org>
 <4DA8535B.4080901@gmail.com>
 <20110415142724.GK18463@8bytes.org>
 <4DA895A2.4060307@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DA895A2.4060307@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Alexandre Demers <alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org


* Alexandre Demers <alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11-04-15 10:27 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:16:59AM -0400, Alexandre Demers wrote:
> >> Ok, I'll test it today. Should I apply it on a clean rc3 without any of
> >> the other patches?
> > Yes, apply it just on -rc3 without any other patch.
> >
> >> BTW, may I suggest adding the info under bug 33012 in kernel bugzilla?
> >> This could be useful in the future.
> > Cool, thanks
> >
> >
> > 	Joerg
> The patch was applied and tested. It looks fine, I'm able to boot
> without problem.

Joerg, mind submitting it with a changelog that includes everything we learned 
about this bug and all the Tested-by's in place?

Is anyone of the opinion that we should try to revert the allocation 
order/alignment changes in addition to this fix?

Thanks,

	Ingo