From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Recover DPMS properly after XRandr re-enablement
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:26:54 +0200
Message-ID: <20110417182654.7c062144@schatten.dmk.lab>
References: <1293021752-7604-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<c6d829$pugo67@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mx01.d-labs.de (ist.d-labs.de [213.239.218.44])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7307D9E754
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sun, 17 Apr 2011 09:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <c6d829$pugo67@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:53:07 +0000
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:42:32 +0000, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> 
> > This patch adds a new helper function to manage the drm_connector
> > DPMS so that it can be called commonly in both places.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> 
> FWIW,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> -Chris
> 

Is this patch still necessary for 2.6.39?

It was needed to fix a regression from 2.6.36 (at least in February). 
( https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24982 )

Regards,
Flo