From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 39202] FPS - KDE desktop effects with 3.0 rc6 kernel
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 01:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20110816084902.E3D1F13005E@annarchy.freedesktop.org>
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
Received: from annarchy.freedesktop.org (annarchy.freedesktop.org
[131.252.210.176])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE589E911
for ;
Tue, 16 Aug 2011 01:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39202
--- Comment #19 from Siganderson 2011-08-16 01:49:02 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> If vblank_mode=0 doesn't make a difference either, I'm afraid you'll really
> need to bisect.
I did a rough bisect (tagging as bad even all the uncompilable commits and
tagging as good every 2.6.38-rc commit without testing it) and got a result.
Is it better to label an uncompilable commit as bad or to skip it?
dcdf3a293522e6ef09d8b3650ac1ceec56438e5d is the first bad commit
commit dcdf3a293522e6ef09d8b3650ac1ceec56438e5d
Author: Roman Zippel
Date: Tue Nov 18 21:25:17 2008 +0100
m68k: Add helper function handle_kernel_fault()
Add helper function handle_kernel_fault() in signal.c, so frame_extra_sizes
can become static, and to avoid future code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
:040000 040000 dd4a90c01a056ed7ac20f83518bf6c041c6190ad
1cd025a7a61a8e0c872bdc34ce039bc18e6e91d0 M arch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.