From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Shirish S <s.shirish@samsung.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] drm: edid: add support for E-DDC
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:08:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120829110843.GE4421@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345887836-15314-2-git-send-email-s.shirish@samsung.com>
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 03:13:56PM +0530, Shirish S wrote:
> The current logic for probing ddc is limited to
> 2 blocks (256 bytes), this patch adds support
> for the 4 block (512) data.
>
> To do this, a single 8-bit segment index is
> passed to the display via the I2C address 30h.
> Data from the selected segment is then immediately
> read via the regular DDC2 address using a repeated
> I2C 'START' signal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shirish S <s.shirish@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index a8743c3..cde7af0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -254,6 +254,8 @@ drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned char *buf,
> int block, int len)
> {
> unsigned char start = block * EDID_LENGTH;
> + unsigned char segment = block >> 1;
> + unsigned char xfers = segment ? 3 : 2;
> int ret, retries = 5;
>
> /* The core i2c driver will automatically retry the transfer if the
> @@ -264,7 +266,12 @@ drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned char *buf,
> */
> do {
> struct i2c_msg msgs[] = {
> - {
> + { /*set segment pointer */
Missing whitespace after '/*'. Perhaps just drop the comment. I don't
see much value in it.
> + .addr = DDC_SEGMENT_ADDR,
> + .flags = segment ? 0 : I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK,
> + .len = 1,
> + .buf = &segment,
> + }, {
> .addr = DDC_ADDR,
> .flags = 0,
> .len = 1,
> @@ -276,15 +283,22 @@ drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned char *buf,
> .buf = buf,
> }
> };
> - ret = i2c_transfer(adapter, msgs, 2);
> + /* Avoid sending the segment addr to not upset non-compliant ddc
> + * monitors.
> + */
Wrong indentation and comment style is wrong. I'm guessing this didn't go
through checkpatch.pl.
Otherwise looks OK to me.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-29 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-25 9:43 [PATCH V4] drm: edid: add support for E-DDC Shirish S
2012-08-25 9:43 ` Shirish S
2012-08-26 18:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-29 11:08 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2012-08-29 13:54 ` Shirish S
2012-08-29 13:44 ` Jean Delvare
2012-08-30 0:22 ` Shirish S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120829110843.GE4421@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=s.shirish@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox