From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Slusarz Subject: Re: Linux 3.7-rc1 (nouveau_bios_score oops). Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:49:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20121021144908.GC22587@joi.lan> References: <1724445.dN2yMEzN6d@localhost> <20121020212036.GA1698@fritha.org> <20121020221948.GE5826@joi.lan> <2155889.FOmdXlva7q@localhost> <20121021120901.GA22587@joi.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , Heinz Diehl , Martin Peres , Heinz Diehl , David Airlie , Ben Skeggs , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?UGF3ZcWC?= Sikora List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 07:38:58AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Marcin Slusarz > wrote: > > > > This looks like ACPI bug... > > I'm _shocked_ to hear that firmware would be fragile. > > Anyway, here's the #1 thing to keep in mind about firmware: > > - firmware is *always* buggy. I know. But this bug is not about broken firmware. It's about Linux kernel ACPI implementation, which (I think) wrongly interprets ACPI script. Marcin