From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maarten Lankhorst Subject: [PATCH v5 7/7] locking-selftests: handle unexpected failures more strictly Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20130620113151.4001.77963.stgit@patser> References: <20130620112811.4001.86934.stgit@patser> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130620112811.4001.86934.stgit@patser> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, robclark@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org When CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not enabled, more tests are expected to pass unexpectedly, but there no tests that should start to fail that pass with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst --- lib/locking-selftest.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c index d554f3f..aad024d 100644 --- a/lib/locking-selftest.c +++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c @@ -976,16 +976,18 @@ static void dotest(void (*testcase_fn)(void), int expected, int lockclass_mask) /* * Filter out expected failures: */ - if (debug_locks != expected) { #ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING + if (expected == FAILURE && debug_locks) { expected_testcase_failures++; printk("failed|"); -#else + } + else +#endif + if (debug_locks != expected) { unexpected_testcase_failures++; printk("FAILED|"); dump_stack(); -#endif } else { testcase_successes++; printk(" ok |");