From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
robclark@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, daniel@ffwll.ch,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] mutex: add support for wound/wait style locks, v5
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:58:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130620115858.GB12479@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130620113111.4001.47384.stgit@patser>
* Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> wrote:
> +The algorithm that TTM came up with for dealing with this problem is quite
> +simple. [...]
'TTM' here reads like a person - but in reality it's the TTM graphics
subsystem, right?
Please clarify this portion of the text.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 11:30 [PATCH v5 0/7] add mutex wait/wound/style style locks Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] arch: make __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval return whether fastpath succeeded or not Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] mutex: add support for wound/wait style locks, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-20 12:16 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 12:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-24 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] mutex: add support for wound/wait style locks Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:58 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] mutex: w/w mutex slowpath debugging Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] mutex: Add ww tests to lib/locking-selftest.c. v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] mutex: add more tests to lib/locking-selftest.c Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] mutex: add more ww tests to test EDEADLK path handling Maarten Lankhorst
2013-06-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] locking-selftests: handle unexpected failures more strictly Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130620115858.GB12479@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robclark@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).