From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] mutex: add support for wound/wait style locks, v5
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:58:58 +0200
Message-ID: <20130620115858.GB12479@gmail.com>
References: <20130620112811.4001.86934.stgit@patser>
 <20130620113111.4001.47384.stgit@patser>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130620113111.4001.47384.stgit@patser>
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, robclark@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org


* Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> wrote:

> +The algorithm that TTM came up with for dealing with this problem is quite
> +simple. [...]

'TTM' here reads like a person - but in reality it's the TTM graphics 
subsystem, right?

Please clarify this portion of the text.

Thanks,

	Ingo