From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: Armada DRM driver on OLPC XO Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:05:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20130628200556.GI4283@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130625204726.BF65C12647A@dev.laptop.org> <20130626184250.43f36e47@armhf> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Daniel Drake Cc: Jean-Francois Moine , linux-arm-kernel , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:54:21PM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > Do you know that there are 2 drm drivers for the Cubox? I posted mine > > (http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-May/168732.html) > > before Russell, but I got no return about it yet. > > I thought there was some agreement that you would merge your efforts > into Russell's driver. Is that still the plan? > > Thanks for the links - I think we can learn something about timer > handling from your work. I'll send a patch shortly incorporating the > basis of something like this into armada_drm. Note that my driver has changed significantly since the last posting; it's now using drm planes and also dmabuf stuff to limited extents (because dmabuf is technically misdesigned for CPUs with noncoherent DMA.)