From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Simplify fb refcounting rules around ->update_plane
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:28:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140422142804.GW18465@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140422140909.GQ10722@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:06:22PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:07:13AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > The introduction of primary planes has apparently caused a bit of fb
> > > refcounting fun for people. That makes it a good time to clean up the
> > > arcane rules and slight differences between ->update_plane and
> > > ->set_config. The new rules are:
> > >
> > > - The core holds a reference for both the new and the old fb (if their
> > > non-NULL of course) while calling into the driver through either
> > > ->update_plane or ->set_config.
> > >
> > > - Drivers may not clobber plane->fb if their callback fails. If they
> > > do that, they need to store a pointer to the old fb in it again.
> > > When calling into the driver plane->fb still points at the current
> > > (old) framebuffer.
> > >
> > > - The core will update the plane->fb pointer on success. Drivers can
> > > do that themselves too.
> > >
> > > - The core will update fb refcounts for the plane->fb pointer,
> > > presuming the drivers hold up their end of the bargain.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 12 +++++-------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c | 15 ---------------
> > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> > > index d8b7099abece..966b480ed543 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> > > @@ -2187,24 +2187,24 @@ int drm_mode_setplane(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > > }
> > >
> > > drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
> > > + old_fb = plane->fb;
> > > ret = plane->funcs->update_plane(plane, crtc, fb,
> > > plane_req->crtc_x, plane_req->crtc_y,
> > > plane_req->crtc_w, plane_req->crtc_h,
> > > plane_req->src_x, plane_req->src_y,
> > > plane_req->src_w, plane_req->src_h);
> > > if (!ret) {
> > > - old_fb = plane->fb;
> > > plane->crtc = crtc;
> > > plane->fb = fb;
> > > - fb = NULL;
> > > }
> > > drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > >
> > > out:
> > > - if (fb)
> > > - drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> > > + if (plane->fb)
> > > + drm_framebuffer_reference(old_fb);
> > ^^^^^^
> >
> > That doesn't look right.
> >
> > Also you're now dereferencing plane->fb after you drop the locks.
>
> Oops, will fix.
>
> > Also i915 fb destruction seems buggy as we do
> > intel_fb->obj->framebuffer_references-- w/o holding struct_mutex.
>
> Hm, this indeed looks fishy. And the offending patch was actually r-b:
> you.
Dang. I suck.
> Not sure what to do here really.
Just s/drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked/drm_gem_object_unreference/
and grab struct_mutex by hand around both operations?
> -Daniel
>
> >
> > > if (old_fb)
> > > drm_framebuffer_unreference(old_fb);
> > > + drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > @@ -2239,9 +2239,7 @@ int drm_mode_set_config_internal(struct drm_mode_set *set)
> > > ret = crtc->funcs->set_config(set);
> > > if (ret == 0) {
> > > crtc->primary->crtc = crtc;
> > > -
> > > - /* crtc->fb must be updated by ->set_config, enforces this. */
> > > - WARN_ON(fb != crtc->primary->fb);
> > > + crtc->primary->fb = fb;
> > > }
> > >
> > > list_for_each_entry(tmp, &crtc->dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head) {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
> > > index e768d35ff22e..8db129c44fea 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
> > > @@ -175,22 +175,7 @@ int drm_primary_helper_update(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > > set.connectors = connector_list;
> > > set.num_connectors = num_connectors;
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * set_config() adjusts crtc->primary->fb; however the DRM setplane
> > > - * code that called us expects to handle the framebuffer update and
> > > - * reference counting; save and restore the current fb before
> > > - * calling it.
> > > - *
> > > - * N.B., we call set_config() directly here rather than using
> > > - * drm_mode_set_config_internal. We're reprogramming the same
> > > - * connectors that were already in use, so we shouldn't need the extra
> > > - * cross-CRTC fb refcounting to accomodate stealing connectors.
> > > - * drm_mode_setplane() already handles the basic refcounting for the
> > > - * framebuffers involved in this operation.
> > > - */
> > > - tmpfb = plane->fb;
> > > ret = crtc->funcs->set_config(&set);
> > > - plane->fb = tmpfb;
> > >
> > > kfree(connector_list);
> > > return ret;
> > > --
> > > 1.9.2
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-22 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-22 9:07 [PATCH] drm: Simplify fb refcounting rules around ->update_plane Daniel Vetter
2014-04-22 9:16 ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-22 10:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-04-22 14:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-22 14:28 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2014-04-22 14:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-22 14:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-23 1:08 ` Matt Roper
2014-04-23 6:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-23 6:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-23 8:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Daniel Vetter
2014-04-23 8:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm: Handle ->disable_plane failures correctly Daniel Vetter
2014-04-23 14:47 ` Matt Roper
2014-04-23 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: Simplify fb refcounting rules around ->update_plane Matt Roper
2014-04-23 15:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-23 15:37 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2014-04-23 15:59 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140422142804.GW18465@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox