From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 05/10] ARM: dts: imx5*, imx6*: correct display-timings nodes. Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:01:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20140624150158.GS32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1402913484-25910-1-git-send-email-denis@eukrea.com> <1402913484-25910-5-git-send-email-denis@eukrea.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1402913484-25910-5-git-send-email-denis@eukrea.com> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Denis Carikli , arm@kernel.org, Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer Cc: Philipp Zabel , Eric =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9nard?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:11:19PM +0200, Denis Carikli wrote: > The imx-drm driver can't use the de-active and > pixelclk-active display-timings properties yet. > > Instead the data-enable and the pixel data clock > polarity are hardcoded in the imx-drm driver. > > So theses properties are now set to keep > the same behaviour when imx-drm will start > using them. > > Signed-off-by: Denis Carikli This patch needs either an ack from the arm-soc/iMX maintainers, or they need to merge it. As there's little positive agreement on the series, I can understand why there's reluctance to merge it. So, can we start having some acks from people please, or at least commitments to merge this patch when the others are deemed to be acceptable. If not, can we have explanations why this should not be merged. Thanks. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.