From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Add DRM for stih4xx platforms Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:58:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20140703215826.GA21739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1403081488-13114-1-git-send-email-benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> <20140703215200.GG32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk (gw-1.arm.linux.org.uk [78.32.30.217]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81B06E77B for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140703215200.GG32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Rob Clark Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" , Laurent Pinchart , Benjamin Gaignard List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:52:00PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 05:31:21PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > > >From a brief look, it looks like my comments have been addressed, so I > > think this is starting to shape up.. > > > > Laurent/Thierry/Russell, I don't suppose any of you are likely to have > > time before 3.17 merge window to give sti one last once-over to see > > what I missed ;-) > > As this appears to be using the component helpers, it would be good for > the author to be pre-warned about the change to the API. I'm going to > be doing this as a two step thing. More on this... just found it in the series. It looks fine, and I expect that the update would be trivial: - the body of sti_drm_add_components() moves into sti_drm_master_probe() and sti_drm_add_components() is removed. - component_master_add_child() is updated to call component_match_add() - component_master_add() is updated to call component_master_add_with_match() instead. So I don't think there's any problem here. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.