From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Lespiau Subject: Re: [v2 00/11] Support for 180 degree HW rotation Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:38:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20140707133802.GA6186@strange.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1404467043-5072-1-git-send-email-sonika.jindal@intel.com> <20140704150620.GH7634@strange.ger.corp.intel.com> <53B904A0.9050406@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53B904A0.9050406@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: "Jindal, Sonika" Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:41:12PM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote: > >Missing from this series, your two documentation patches (we need to > >bundle things up as a entity that makes sense for one of the maintainers > >to pick it up (either Dave or Daniel)). > > > I was not aware that documentation patches should also be part of this. > Because I was asked to send the igt testcase separately I thought > documentation will also go separately. Documentation patches have > also got reviewed-by tags. What do you suggest? Should I send the > patchset again with documentation? Will Igt still be a separate > post? Please, resend the series entirely once again, with the latest review tags added, the mutex locking around update_fbc() and the documentation patches. The reason with the documentation patches are part of this series is that adding documentation is a requirement for adding new properties so the whole DRM subsystem has a chance to converge towards a common set of properties. That series should also be annotated with a v3 in the cover letter. Cheers, -- Damien