From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid()
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:20:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150226092007.GK8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1712883.jTy2B8DxIY@avalon>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:52:02AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Friday 16 January 2015 17:47:34 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:37:43PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Replace the internal EDID read implementation by a call to the new EDID
> > > read core function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> > > Tested-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
> >
> > Thanks, committed, and updated the summary line to:
> >
> > "drm/i2c: tda998x: use drm_do_get_edid()"
> >
> > to match the style used in the past.
>
> I can't see the patch in Dave's -next branch, has it been lost somewhere ?
I thought I had sent a pull request before the last merge window, but
it seems I didn't. That's the problem when you end up carrying too many
patches... tracking what's been sent and to whom is a real pain. The
only time I get to verify what's been sent is after it's appeared in
mainline (so after a merge window).
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-26 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-16 16:37 [PATCH RESEND] drm: tda998x: Use drm_do_get_edid() Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-16 17:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-17 8:07 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2015-02-26 7:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-02-26 9:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-02-26 18:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150226092007.GK8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox