dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Simon Farnsworth <simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Use large transactions for I2C over AUX
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:28:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150311192820.GZ11371@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150211120521.GS9152@intel.com>

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:05:21PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:38:08PM +0000, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> > Older DisplayPort to DVI-D Dual Link adapters designed by Bizlink have bugs
> > in their I2C over AUX implementation (fixed in newer revisions). They work
> > fine with Windows, but fail with Linux.
> > 
> > It turns out that they cannot keep an I2C transaction open unless the
> > previous read was 16 bytes; shorter reads can only be followed by a zero
> > byte transfer ending the I2C transaction.
> > 
> > Copy Windows's behaviour, and read 16 bytes at a time. If we get a short
> > reply, assume that there's a hardware bottleneck, and shrink our read size
> > to match. For this purpose, use the algorithm in the DisplayPort 1.2 spec,
> > in the hopes that it'll be closest to what Windows does.
> > 
> > Also provide an unsafe module parameter for testing smaller transfer sizes,
> > in case there are sinks out there that cannot work with Windows.
> > 
> > Note also that despite the previous comment in drm_dp_i2c_xfer, this speeds
> > up native DP EDID reads; Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> found
> > the following changes in his testing:
> > 
> > Device under test:     old  -> with this patch
> > DP->DVI (OUI 001cf8):  40ms -> 35ms
> > DP->VGA (OUI 0022b9):  45ms -> 38ms
> > Zotac DP->2xHDMI:      25ms ->  4ms
> > Asus PB278 monitor:    22ms ->  3ms
> > 
> > A back of the envelope calculation shows that peak theoretical transfer rate
> > for 1 byte reads is around 60 kbit/s; with 16 byte reads, this increases to
> > around 500 kbit/s, which explains the increase in speed.
> > 
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55228
> > Tested-by: Aidan Marks <aidanamarks@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Farnsworth <simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk>
> > ---
> > 
> > v4 changes:
> > 
> >  * Change short reply algorithm after suggestions from Ville.
> > 
> >  * Expanded commit message.
> > 
> >  * Mark the module parameter unsafe.
> > 
> >  * Use clamp() to bring the module parameter into range when used.
> > 
> > v3 changes, after feedback from Ville and more testing of Windows:
> > 
> >  * Change the short reply algorithm to match Ville's description of the
> >    DisplayPort 1.2 spec wording.
> > 
> >  * Add a module parameter to set the default transfer size for
> >    experiments. Requested over IRC by Ville.
> > 
> > No-one's been able to find a device that does short replies, but experiments
> > show that bigger reads are faster on most devices. Ville got:
> > 
> >  DP->DVI (OUI 001cf8):  40ms -> 35ms
> >  DP->VGA (OUI 0022b9):  45ms -> 38ms
> >  Zotac DP->2xHDMI:      25ms ->  4ms
> > 
> > v2 changes, after feedback from Thierry and Ville:
> > 
> >  * Handle short replies. I've decided (arbitrarily) that a short reply
> >    results in us dropping back to the newly chosen size for the rest of this
> >    I2C transaction. Thus, given an attempt to read the first 16 bytes of
> >    EDID, and a sink that only does 4 bytes of buffering, we will see the
> >    following AUX transfers for the EDID read (after address is set):
> > 
> >    <set address, block etc>
> >    Read 16 bytes from I2C over AUX.
> >    Reply with 4 bytes
> >    Read 4 bytes
> >    Reply with 4 bytes
> >    Read 4 bytes
> >    Reply with 4 bytes
> >    Read 4 bytes
> >    Reply with 4 bytes
> >    <end I2C transaction>
> > 
> > Note that I've not looked at MST support - I have neither the DP 1.2 spec
> > nor any MST branch devices, so I can't test anything I write or check it
> > against a spec. It looks from the code, however, as if MST has the branch
> > device do the split from a big request into small transactions.
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h     |  5 +++
> >  2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 79968e3..105fd66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -396,11 +396,13 @@ static u32 drm_dp_i2c_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> >   * retrying the transaction as appropriate.  It is assumed that the
> >   * aux->transfer function does not modify anything in the msg other than the
> >   * reply field.
> > + *
> > + * Returns bytes transferred on success, or a negative error code on failure.
> >   */
> >  static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned int retry;
> > -	int err;
> > +	int ret;
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * DP1.2 sections 2.7.7.1.5.6.1 and 2.7.7.1.6.6.1: A DP Source device
> > @@ -409,14 +411,14 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >  	 */
> >  	for (retry = 0; retry < 7; retry++) {
> >  		mutex_lock(&aux->hw_mutex);
> > -		err = aux->transfer(aux, msg);
> > +		ret = aux->transfer(aux, msg);
> >  		mutex_unlock(&aux->hw_mutex);
> > -		if (err < 0) {
> > -			if (err == -EBUSY)
> > +		if (ret < 0) {
> > +			if (ret == -EBUSY)
> >  				continue;
> >  
> > -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("transaction failed: %d\n", err);
> > -			return err;
> > +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("transaction failed: %d\n", ret);
> > +			return ret;
> >  		}
> >  
> >  
> > @@ -457,9 +459,7 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >  			 * Both native ACK and I2C ACK replies received. We
> >  			 * can assume the transfer was successful.
> >  			 */
> > -			if (err < msg->size)
> > -				return -EPROTO;
> > -			return 0;
> > +			return ret;
> >  
> >  		case DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_NACK:
> >  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("I2C nack\n");
> > @@ -482,14 +482,55 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >  	return -EREMOTEIO;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Keep retrying drm_dp_i2c_do_msg until all data has been transferred.
> > + *
> > + * Returns an error code on failure, or a recommended transfer size on success.
> > + */
> > +static int drm_dp_i2c_drain_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *orig_msg)
> 
> orig_msg should be const to make sure someone doesn't change it by
> accident since that would break drm_dp_i2c_xfer().
> 
> Otherwise looks good to me, so
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> I also tested this version with a few dongles and everything seems to
> work as intended.

Did this fall through the cracks, or are we waiting for some resolution
to that one bug?


-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-10 18:38 [PATCH] drm/dp: Use large transactions for I2C over AUX Simon Farnsworth
2015-02-10 18:42 ` Simon Farnsworth
2015-02-11  5:36   ` Dave Airlie
2015-02-11  7:25     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-11  8:13 ` Jani Nikula
2015-02-11 12:05 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-03-11 19:28   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-03-11 21:06     ` Daniel Vetter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-26 15:22 Simon Farnsworth
2015-01-26 15:33 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-26 15:47   ` Simon Farnsworth
2015-01-26 16:11     ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-26 16:39       ` Simon Farnsworth
2015-01-27 13:36         ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-28  8:59           ` Jani Nikula
2015-01-28  9:10             ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-28  9:33               ` Jani Nikula
2015-01-28 10:30                 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-28 10:45                 ` Simon Farnsworth
2015-01-26 16:00   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-23 18:40 Simon Farnsworth
2015-01-23 19:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-23 21:21   ` Thierry Reding
2015-01-24 11:27     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-26  9:50     ` Simon Farnsworth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150311192820.GZ11371@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox