From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/20] drm: Don't update plane properties for atomic planes if it stays the same
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:10:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150707121011.GQ7568@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559BA7DA.8010701@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 07-07-15 om 11:18 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:08:13AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> This allows the first atomic call during hw init to be a real modeset,
> >> which is useful for forcing a recalculation.
> > fbcon is optional, you can't rely on anything being done in any specific
> > way. What exactly do you need this for, what's the implications?
> In the hw readout I noticed some warnings when I wasn't setting any mode property in the readout.
> I want the first function to be the modeset, so we have a sane base to commit changes on.
> Ideally this whole function would have a atomic counterpart which does it in one go. :)
Yeah. Otoh as soon as we have atomic modeset working we can replace all
the legacy entry points with atomic helpers, and then even plane_disable
will be a full atomic modeset.
What did fall apart with just touching properties/planes now?
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1436252911-5703-1-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
2015-07-07 7:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] drm/atomic: add connectors_changed to separate it from mode_changed Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-07 8:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-07 10:05 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-07 12:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-07 7:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] drm: Don't update plane properties for atomic planes if it stays the same Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-07 9:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2015-07-07 10:20 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-07 12:10 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-07-07 14:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-07 16:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-07 15:08 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-07 16:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-08 8:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-08 8:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-08 16:35 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-08 17:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2015-07-08 18:25 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-08 20:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-13 8:59 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-13 9:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2015-07-13 9:23 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-13 9:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-13 9:49 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-13 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150707121011.GQ7568@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox