From: Peter Wu <peter-VTkQYDcBqhK7DlmcbJSQ7g@public.gmane.org>
To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: ensure matching ACPI handle and supported functions
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 01:38:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707233827.2100-2-peter@lekensteyn.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160707233827.2100-1-peter-VTkQYDcBqhK7DlmcbJSQ7g@public.gmane.org>
Ensure that the returned set of supported DSM functions (MUX, Optimus)
match the ACPI handle that is set in nouveau_dsm_pci_probe.
As there are no machines with a MUX function on just one PCI device and
an Optimus on another, there should not be a functional impact. This
change however makes this implicit assumption more obvious.
Convert int to bool and rename has_dsm to has_mux while at it. Let the
caller set nouveau_dsm_priv.dhandle as needed.
v2: pass dhandle to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 58 +++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
index db76b94..886a67c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
@@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ bool nouveau_is_v1_dsm(void) {
return nouveau_dsm_priv.dsm_detected;
}
-#define NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_MUX 0x1
-#define NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_OPT 0x2
-
#ifdef CONFIG_VGA_SWITCHEROO
static const char nouveau_dsm_muid[] = {
0xA0, 0xA0, 0x95, 0x9D, 0x60, 0x00, 0x48, 0x4D,
@@ -212,26 +209,33 @@ static const struct vga_switcheroo_handler nouveau_dsm_handler = {
.get_client_id = nouveau_dsm_get_client_id,
};
-static int nouveau_dsm_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+static void nouveau_dsm_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, acpi_handle *dhandle_out,
+ bool *has_mux, bool *has_opt)
{
acpi_handle dhandle;
- int retval = 0;
+ bool supports_mux;
+ bool supports_opt;
dhandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev);
if (!dhandle)
- return false;
+ return;
if (!acpi_has_method(dhandle, "_DSM"))
- return false;
+ return;
- if (acpi_check_dsm(dhandle, nouveau_dsm_muid, 0x00000102,
- 1 << NOUVEAU_DSM_POWER))
- retval |= NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_MUX;
+ supports_mux = acpi_check_dsm(dhandle, nouveau_dsm_muid, 0x00000102,
+ 1 << NOUVEAU_DSM_POWER);
+ supports_opt = nouveau_check_optimus_dsm(dhandle);
- if (nouveau_check_optimus_dsm(dhandle))
- retval |= NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_OPT;
+ /* Does not look like a Nvidia device. */
+ if (!supports_mux && !supports_opt)
+ return;
- if (retval & NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_OPT) {
+ *dhandle_out = dhandle;
+ *has_mux = supports_mux;
+ *has_opt = supports_opt;
+
+ if (supports_opt) {
uint32_t result;
nouveau_optimus_dsm(dhandle, NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_CAPS, 0,
&result);
@@ -240,10 +244,6 @@ static int nouveau_dsm_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
(result & OPTIMUS_DYNAMIC_PWR_CAP) ? "dynamic power, " : "",
(result & OPTIMUS_HDA_CODEC_MASK) ? "hda bios codec supported" : "");
}
- if (retval)
- nouveau_dsm_priv.dhandle = dhandle;
-
- return retval;
}
static bool nouveau_dsm_detect(void)
@@ -251,11 +251,11 @@ static bool nouveau_dsm_detect(void)
char acpi_method_name[255] = { 0 };
struct acpi_buffer buffer = {sizeof(acpi_method_name), acpi_method_name};
struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
- int has_dsm = 0;
- int has_optimus = 0;
+ acpi_handle dhandle = NULL;
+ bool has_mux = false;
+ bool has_optimus = false;
int vga_count = 0;
bool guid_valid;
- int retval;
bool ret = false;
/* lookup the MXM GUID */
@@ -268,32 +268,26 @@ static bool nouveau_dsm_detect(void)
while ((pdev = pci_get_class(PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA << 8, pdev)) != NULL) {
vga_count++;
- retval = nouveau_dsm_pci_probe(pdev);
- if (retval & NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_MUX)
- has_dsm |= 1;
- if (retval & NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_OPT)
- has_optimus = 1;
+ nouveau_dsm_pci_probe(pdev, &dhandle, &has_mux, &has_optimus);
}
while ((pdev = pci_get_class(PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_3D << 8, pdev)) != NULL) {
vga_count++;
- retval = nouveau_dsm_pci_probe(pdev);
- if (retval & NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_MUX)
- has_dsm |= 1;
- if (retval & NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_OPT)
- has_optimus = 1;
+ nouveau_dsm_pci_probe(pdev, &dhandle, &has_mux, &has_optimus);
}
/* find the optimus DSM or the old v1 DSM */
- if (has_optimus == 1) {
+ if (has_optimus) {
+ nouveau_dsm_priv.dhandle = dhandle;
acpi_get_name(nouveau_dsm_priv.dhandle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME,
&buffer);
printk(KERN_INFO "VGA switcheroo: detected Optimus DSM method %s handle\n",
acpi_method_name);
nouveau_dsm_priv.optimus_detected = true;
ret = true;
- } else if (vga_count == 2 && has_dsm && guid_valid) {
+ } else if (vga_count == 2 && has_mux && guid_valid) {
+ nouveau_dsm_priv.dhandle = dhandle;
acpi_get_name(nouveau_dsm_priv.dhandle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME,
&buffer);
printk(KERN_INFO "VGA switcheroo: detected DSM switching method %s handle\n",
--
2.9.0
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-07 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 23:38 [PATCH v2 0/4] nouveau RPM fixes for Optimus Peter Wu
[not found] ` <20160707233827.2100-1-peter-VTkQYDcBqhK7DlmcbJSQ7g@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07 23:38 ` Peter Wu [this message]
2016-07-07 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: return supported DSM functions Peter Wu
2016-07-07 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: check for function 0x1B before using it Peter Wu
2016-07-07 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM Peter Wu
[not found] ` <20160707233827.2100-5-peter-VTkQYDcBqhK7DlmcbJSQ7g@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-08 8:30 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-08 17:31 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v2 0/4] nouveau RPM fixes for Optimus Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160707233827.2100-2-peter@lekensteyn.nl \
--to=peter-vtkqydcbqhk7dlmcbjsq7g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=airlied-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox