From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: introduce bridge detaching mechanism
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 17:24:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160823152437.GN10980@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471961404-13052-1-git-send-email-andrea.merello@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:10:04PM +0200, Andrea Merello wrote:
> Up to now, once a bridge has been attached to a DRM device, it cannot
> be undone.
>
> In particular you couldn't rmmod/insmod a DRM driver that uses a bridge,
> because the bridge would remain bound to the first (dead) driver instance.
>
> This patch fixes this by introducing drm_encoder_detach() and a ->detach
> callback in drm_bridge_funcs for the bridge to be notified about detaches.
>
> It's DRM/KMS driver responsibility to call drm_encoder_detach().
>
> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Suggested-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>
> Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> index 2555430..c4ace90 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> @@ -125,6 +125,39 @@ int drm_bridge_attach(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_bridge_attach);
>
> /**
> + * drm_bridge_detach - deassociate given bridge from its DRM device
> + *
> + * @bridge: bridge control structure
> + *
> + * called by a kms driver to unlink one of our encoder/bridge to the given
> + * bridge.
> + *
> + * Note that tearing down links between the bridge and our encoder/bridge
> + * objects needs to be handled by the kms driver itself
> + *
> + * RETURNS:
> + * Zero on success, error code on failure
> + */
> +int drm_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
Generally detach/cleanup functions have a return type of void - there's no
way (usually) to bail out on errors anyway.
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!bridge || !bridge->dev)
Hence WARN_ON here probably.
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (bridge->funcs->detach) {
> + ret = bridge->funcs->detach(bridge);
Same for the callback to the backend.
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + bridge->dev = NULL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_bridge_detach);
> +
> +/**
> * DOC: bridge callbacks
> *
> * The &drm_bridge_funcs ops are populated by the bridge driver. The DRM
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> index b618b50..eef4db8 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> @@ -1766,6 +1766,7 @@ struct drm_plane {
> */
> struct drm_bridge_funcs {
> int (*attach)(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
> + int (*detach)(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
kerneldoc for @detach is missing here. And I think it'd be good to also
make the kerneldoc for @attach a stand-alone comment and flesh it out a
bit.
You might also need to include this into the simple pipe series so that
you can wire up detach support for those helpers too.
Otherwise looks all good I think.
Thanks, Daniel
>
> /**
> * @mode_fixup:
> @@ -3196,6 +3197,7 @@ extern int drm_bridge_add(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
> extern void drm_bridge_remove(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
> extern struct drm_bridge *of_drm_find_bridge(struct device_node *np);
> extern int drm_bridge_attach(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_bridge *bridge);
> +extern int drm_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
>
> bool drm_bridge_mode_fixup(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> --
> 2.7.4
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-23 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-23 14:10 [PATCH] drm/bridge: introduce bridge detaching mechanism Andrea Merello
2016-08-23 15:24 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160823152437.GN10980@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=andrea.merello@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox