From: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@vmware.com>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/vmwgfx: Remove call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:03:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161005170300.GA10764@promb-2n-dhcp150.eng.vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO_48GGkWjVgDYcnEGORoV1yGteCiYRXEZ2OG_dJkRHL22e8Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
I'm preparing a fixes pull request, and I'll include this one if it
hasn't been applied by others already.
Sinclair
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:41:22PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Hi Thomas, Sinclair,
>
> On 23 September 2016 at 18:26, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:08:28AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >> Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a
> >> timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not
> >> need to handle such conversion in the caller. The only challenge are
> >> those callers that wish to differentiate the error code between the
> >> nonblocking busy check and potentially blocking wait.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >> Cc: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@vmware.com>
> >> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@vmware.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >
> Could you please let me know if this patch is already queued up at
> your end, or should I just take it via drm-misc with Sinclair's r-b?
>
> Thanks and Best,
> Sumit.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-05 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-29 7:08 [PATCH 01/11] drm/amdgpu: Remove call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait Chris Wilson
2016-08-29 7:08 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/etnaviv: Remove manual " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 12:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-05 16:15 ` Sumit Semwal
2016-10-10 13:17 ` Lucas Stach
2016-08-29 7:08 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/msm: Remove " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 12:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 13:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark
2016-08-29 7:08 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/nouveau: " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 12:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-05 16:05 ` Sumit Semwal
2016-08-29 7:08 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/vmwgfx: " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 12:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-05 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sumit Semwal
2016-10-05 17:03 ` Sinclair Yeh [this message]
2016-08-29 7:08 ` [PATCH 06/11] dma-buf: Introduce fence_get_rcu_safe() Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 12:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 13:34 ` Markus Heiser
2016-08-29 7:08 ` [PATCH 07/11] dma-buf: Restart reservation_object_get_fences_rcu() after writes Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 13:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29 7:08 ` [PATCH 08/11] dma-buf: Restart reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 13:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29 7:08 ` [PATCH 09/11] dma-buf: Restart reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu() " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 13:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29 7:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] dma-buf: Use seqlock to close RCU race in test_signaled_single Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 13:49 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 14:02 ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-25 20:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29 7:08 ` [PATCH 11/11] dma-buf: Do a fast lockless check for poll with timeout=0 Chris Wilson
2016-08-29 18:16 ` [PATCH] dma-buf/sync-file: Avoid enable fence signaling if poll(.timeout=0) Chris Wilson
2016-08-29 18:26 ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-09-13 14:46 ` Sumit Semwal
2016-09-15 0:00 ` Rafael Antognolli
2016-09-21 7:26 ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-09-21 11:08 ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 13:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] dma-buf: Do a fast lockless check for poll with timeout=0 Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 14:15 ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 15:06 ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 15:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 17:59 ` Christian König
2016-09-25 20:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29 8:20 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/amdgpu: Remove call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait Christian König
2016-09-23 12:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-05 16:03 ` Sumit Semwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161005170300.GA10764@promb-2n-dhcp150.eng.vmware.com \
--to=syeh@vmware.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).