From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: gustavo-THi1TnShQwVAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/tegra: Support for sync file-based fences in submit
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:15:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170313071500.GB15513@ulmo.ba.sec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170309175718.14843-4-mperttunen-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4943 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:57:18PM +0200, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> Add support for sync file-based prefences and postfences
> to job submission. Fences are passed to the Host1x implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c
> index 64dff8530403..bf4a2a13c17d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/host1x.h>
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/sync_file.h>
>
> #include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> @@ -344,6 +345,7 @@ int tegra_drm_submit(struct tegra_drm_context *context,
> struct drm_tegra_submit *args, struct drm_device *drm,
> struct drm_file *file)
> {
> + struct host1x *host1x = dev_get_drvdata(drm->dev->parent);
> unsigned int num_cmdbufs = args->num_cmdbufs;
> unsigned int num_relocs = args->num_relocs;
> unsigned int num_waitchks = args->num_waitchks;
> @@ -361,6 +363,11 @@ int tegra_drm_submit(struct tegra_drm_context *context,
> if (args->num_syncpts != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* Check for unrecognized flags */
> + if (args->flags & ~(DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_WAIT_FENCE_FD |
> + DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_CREATE_FENCE_FD))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> job = host1x_job_alloc(context->channel, args->num_cmdbufs,
> args->num_relocs, args->num_waitchks);
> if (!job)
> @@ -372,19 +379,27 @@ int tegra_drm_submit(struct tegra_drm_context *context,
> job->class = context->client->base.class;
> job->serialize = true;
>
> + if (args->flags & DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_WAIT_FENCE_FD) {
> + job->prefence = sync_file_get_fence(args->fence);
> + if (!job->prefence) {
> + err = -ENOENT;
> + goto put_job;
> + }
> + }
> +
> while (num_cmdbufs) {
> struct drm_tegra_cmdbuf cmdbuf;
> struct host1x_bo *bo;
>
> if (copy_from_user(&cmdbuf, cmdbufs, sizeof(cmdbuf))) {
> err = -EFAULT;
> - goto fail;
> + goto put_fence;
> }
>
> bo = host1x_bo_lookup(file, cmdbuf.handle);
> if (!bo) {
> err = -ENOENT;
> - goto fail;
> + goto put_fence;
> }
>
> host1x_job_add_gather(job, bo, cmdbuf.words, cmdbuf.offset);
> @@ -398,19 +413,19 @@ int tegra_drm_submit(struct tegra_drm_context *context,
> &relocs[num_relocs], drm,
> file);
> if (err < 0)
> - goto fail;
> + goto put_fence;
> }
>
> if (copy_from_user(job->waitchk, waitchks,
> sizeof(*waitchks) * num_waitchks)) {
> err = -EFAULT;
> - goto fail;
> + goto put_fence;
> }
>
> if (copy_from_user(&syncpt, (void __user *)(uintptr_t)args->syncpts,
> sizeof(syncpt))) {
> err = -EFAULT;
> - goto fail;
> + goto put_fence;
> }
>
> job->is_addr_reg = context->client->ops->is_addr_reg;
> @@ -423,20 +438,54 @@ int tegra_drm_submit(struct tegra_drm_context *context,
>
> err = host1x_job_pin(job, context->client->base.dev);
> if (err)
> - goto fail;
> + goto put_fence;
>
> err = host1x_job_submit(job);
> if (err)
> - goto fail_submit;
> + goto unpin_job;
Shouldn't all error-unwinding gotos after this jump to the unpin_job
label as well? Seems like they all jump to put_fence instead, which I
think would leave the job pinned on failure.
>
> - args->fence = job->syncpt_end;
> + if (args->flags & DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_CREATE_FENCE_FD) {
> + struct dma_fence *fence;
> + struct sync_file *file;
> +
> + fence = host1x_fence_create(
> + host1x, host1x_syncpt_get(host1x, job->syncpt_id),
> + job->syncpt_end);
> + if (!fence) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto put_fence;
> + }
> +
> + file = sync_file_create(fence);
> + if (!file) {
> + dma_fence_put(fence);
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto put_fence;
> + }
> +
> + err = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dma_fence_put(fence);
> + goto put_fence;
> + }
> +
> + fd_install(err, file->file);
> + args->fence = err;
> + } else {
> + args->fence = job->syncpt_end;
> + }
>
> + if (job->prefence)
> + dma_fence_put(job->prefence);
> host1x_job_put(job);
> return 0;
>
> -fail_submit:
> +unpin_job:
> host1x_job_unpin(job);
> -fail:
> +put_fence:
> + if (job->prefence)
> + dma_fence_put(job->prefence);
Since we already have a conditional to check for usage of fence, I'm
wondering if we can simplify this a little and leave out the put_fence
label altogether, like so:
unpin_job:
host1x_job_unpin(job);
put_job:
if (job->prefence)
dma_fence_put(job->prefence);
host1x_job_put(job);
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 17:57 [PATCH 0/3] Tegra Host1x dma_fence/sync_file support Mikko Perttunen
[not found] ` <20170309175718.14843-1-mperttunen-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-09 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] gpu: host1x: Add support for DMA fences Mikko Perttunen
2017-03-09 17:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/tegra: Add sync file support to submit interface Mikko Perttunen
2017-03-09 17:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/tegra: Support for sync file-based fences in submit Mikko Perttunen
[not found] ` <20170309175718.14843-4-mperttunen-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-13 7:15 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
[not found] ` <20170313071500.GB15513-EkSeR96xj6Pcmrwk2tT4+A@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-13 9:07 ` Mikko Perttunen
2017-03-13 17:46 ` Thierry Reding
2017-03-09 18:58 ` [PATCH 0/3] Tegra Host1x dma_fence/sync_file support Daniel Vetter
[not found] ` <CAKMK7uH=_9wXDS+yN4e60878j7kDSo+isrePOeDBP5HnHu-tjw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-09 19:09 ` Mikko Perttunen
2017-03-10 12:43 ` Daniel Vetter
[not found] ` <20170310124334.6v4tmmn5vxqvhs2w-dv86pmgwkMBes7Z6vYuT8azUEOm+Xw19@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-13 8:55 ` Mikko Perttunen
[not found] ` <fcca70a0-8bfe-d1b6-329f-ded53fd98a72-/1wQRMveznE@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-13 10:22 ` Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-11 22:22 [PATCH 0/3] drm/tegra: Add support for fence FDs Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <20180111222249.29105-1-thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-01-11 22:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/tegra: Support for sync file-based fences in submit Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170313071500.GB15513@ulmo.ba.sec \
--to=thierry.reding-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gustavo-THi1TnShQwVAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mperttunen-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox