From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Cc: Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] drm: Plane YCbCr to RGB conversion related properties
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:55:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170424165501.GB30290@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a0ed660-89ff-3883-c2a2-cd15f490c591@ti.com>
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:49:04PM +0300, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> On 04/24/17 18:13, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >> What about the uapi structs? In the patch there is an explicit struct
> >> naming each coefficient for what they are for in YCbCr to RGB
> >> conversion. Is this Ok, or should we go with a generic (CTM style)
> >> matrix, that could be used for RGB to YCbCr conversion too?
> > Not sure what we're talking about here, but like I said I think we
> > should stick to a fairly limited set of standard props and just have
> > each driver map the hardware resources to them as best they can.
> >
>
> Just about the implementation detail, if we should have a separate uapi
> struct for YCbCr to RGB CSC and RGB to YCbCr CSC. If we are going to use
> the same struct, then we could as well use the already existing CTM struct.
>
> > If you just have csc+(de)gamma then I guess it might make sense
> > to just expose the YCbCr->RGB and degamma. If you have
> > degamma+csc+gamma then it might make sense to expose both
> > YCbCr->RGB, degamma, CTM, and gamma, and just refuse any
> > combination that can't be done. Eg. can't do YCbCr->RGB if
> > degamma is used, and YCbCr->RGB + CTM would require multiplying
> > the matrices together which you may or may not want to bother
> > with, I guess we could try to put some matrix math helpers into
> > the core to make such things less painful for drivers?
>
> In fact we have plane specific YCbCr to RGB CSC (only preoffset
> possible), then (per crtc) gamma table, and finally a (per crtc) RGB to
> YCbCr CSC with optional post offset (so it can be used either as CSC or
> CTM).
So with that plane hw you could perhaps do:
- YCbCr->RGB if you input is not linear, but then you must
blend using non-linear data
- colorspace conversion if your input is alredy linear
And with your crtc hw you could do:
- degamma + CTM
- gamma + RGB->YCbCr
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-21 9:51 [PATCH RFC 0/6] drm: Add properties to control YCbCr to RGB conversion Jyri Sarha
2017-04-21 9:51 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] drm: drm_color_mgmt.h needs struct drm_crtc declaration Jyri Sarha
2017-04-21 11:46 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-04-21 9:51 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] drm: Make drm_atomic_replace_property_blob_from_id() more generic Jyri Sarha
2017-04-21 11:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-02 8:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-04-21 9:51 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] drm: Plane YCbCr to RGB conversion related properties Jyri Sarha
2017-04-21 11:17 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-04-21 12:10 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-04-21 13:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-04-21 12:58 ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-04-21 13:39 ` Jyri Sarha
2017-04-21 13:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-04-21 14:53 ` Brian Starkey
2017-04-21 15:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-04-21 15:34 ` Brian Starkey
2017-04-21 16:49 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-04-24 12:58 ` Brian Starkey
2017-04-24 9:02 ` [PATCH] RFC: Design: DRM: Blending pipeline using DRM plane properties Shashank Sharma
2017-04-24 13:21 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] drm: Plane YCbCr to RGB conversion related properties Jyri Sarha
2017-04-24 15:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-04-24 15:49 ` Jyri Sarha
2017-04-24 16:55 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-04-26 12:56 ` Jyri Sarha
2017-04-26 13:28 ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-04-26 17:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-05-02 8:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-02 9:29 ` Jyri Sarha
2017-04-21 9:51 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] drm/omap: cleanup color space conversion Jyri Sarha
2017-04-21 11:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-04-21 9:51 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] drm/omap: csc full range support Jyri Sarha
2017-04-21 11:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-04-21 9:51 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] drm/omap: Enable ycbcr_to_rgb_properties for omapdrm planes REVISIT Jyri Sarha
2017-04-21 12:53 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] drm: Add properties to control YCbCr to RGB conversion Sharma, Shashank
2017-04-21 13:50 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170424165501.GB30290@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jsarha@ti.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox