From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: rfc: remove print_vma_addr ? (was Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:08:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20180315170830.GA17574@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20180314143529.1456168-1-arnd@arndb.de> <2929.1521106970@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1521133006.22221.35.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1521133006.22221.35.camel-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , David Howells , Arnd Bergmann , Linux-Arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-ide-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev , linux-wireless , Linux PWM List , linux-rtc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-spi , USB list , DRI Development , Linux Fbdev development list , Linux Watchdog Mailing List , Linux FS Devel List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for > print_vma_addr and removes all the uses similar to the > print_symbol() removal. > > This now avoids any possible printk interleaving. > > Unfortunately, without some #ifdef in vsprintf, which > I would like to avoid, it increases the nommu kernel > size by ~500 bytes. > > Anyone think this is acceptable? > > Here's the overall patch, but I have it as a series > --- > Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst | 9 +++++ > arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 13 +++---- > arch/mips/mm/fault.c | 16 ++++----- > arch/parisc/mm/fault.c | 15 ++++---- > arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 11 +++--- > arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 7 ++-- > arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c | 8 ++--- > arch/sparc/mm/fault_64.c | 8 ++--- > arch/tile/kernel/signal.c | 9 ++--- > arch/um/kernel/trap.c | 13 +++---- > arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 10 ++---- > arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 18 ++++------ > arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 12 +++---- > include/linux/mm.h | 1 - > lib/vsprintf.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > mm/memory.c | 33 ------------------ > 16 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-) This doesn't feel like a huge win since it's only called ~once per architecture. I'd be more excited if it made the printing of the whole thing standardised; eg we have a print_fault() function in mm/memory.c which takes a suitable set of arguments.