dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Stefan Schake <stschake@gmail.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/vc4: Restrict active CTM to one CRTC
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:29:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180326082919.GR14155@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOZHkRy65yJ=_uvjVsW8fsWvaPxH6hVs+MytTq98SRhaRaVXhw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 08:14:35PM +0200, Stefan Schake wrote:
> Hey Daniel,
> 
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > On 25 March 2018 at 02:52, Stefan Schake <stschake@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> +static int vc4_crtc_get_ctm_fifo(struct vc4_dev *vc4)
> >> +{
> >> +       return VC4_GET_FIELD(HVS_READ(SCALER_OLEDOFFS),
> >> +                            SCALER_OLEDOFFS_DISPFIFO);
> >> +}
> >
> > This needs to be managed as a global resource through atomic state
> > objects, rather than checking the current hardware state.
> 
> Do you mean as a property or some such that is accessible to userland
> or merely that this could be raced?
> 
> I haven't had much luck finding examples for resources shared between CRTCs
> in the current tree. My understanding here was that if userland commits
> on CRTC B after a check-only on A, we are no longer bound by the earlier
> result for the check-only. Otherwise, I would have to already commit my
> CTM block to one CRTC at check (possibly check only) time.

https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/gpu/drm-kms.html#handling-driver-private-state

since you only have one CTM it's a shared resource which internally needs
to be tracked as a driver private thing.

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-26  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-25  1:52 [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/vc4: Atomic color management support Stefan Schake
2018-03-25  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/vc4: Add some missing HVS register definitions Stefan Schake
2018-03-25  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/vc4: Expose gamma as atomic property Stefan Schake
2018-03-30 16:05   ` Eric Anholt
2018-03-25  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/vc4: Add color transformation matrix (CTM) support Stefan Schake
2018-03-30 16:11   ` Eric Anholt
2018-03-25  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/vc4: Restrict active CTM to one CRTC Stefan Schake
2018-03-25  8:01   ` Daniel Stone
2018-03-25 18:14     ` Stefan Schake
2018-03-26  8:29       ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-03-26 10:52         ` Daniel Stone

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180326082919.GR14155@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=stschake@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox