From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/15] dma-fence: Allow wait_any_timeout for all fences
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 16:25:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180503142603.28513-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180503142603.28513-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
When this was introduced in
commit a519435a96597d8cd96123246fea4ae5a6c90b02
Author: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:34:16 2015 +0200
dma-buf/fence: add fence_wait_any_timeout function v2
there was a restriction added that this only works if the dma-fence
uses the dma_fence_default_wait hook. Which works for amdgpu, which is
the only caller. Well, until you share some buffers with e.g. i915,
then you get an -EINVAL.
But there's really no reason for this, because all drivers must
support callbacks. The special ->wait hook is only as an optimization;
if the driver needs to create a worker thread for an active callback,
then it can avoid to do that if it knows that there's a process
context available already. So ->wait is just an optimization, just
using the logic in dma_fence_default_wait() should work for all
drivers.
Let's remove this restriction.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
index 7b5b40d6b70e..59049375bd19 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
@@ -503,11 +503,6 @@ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout(struct dma_fence **fences, uint32_t count,
for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
struct dma_fence *fence = fences[i];
- if (fence->ops->wait != dma_fence_default_wait) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto fence_rm_cb;
- }
-
cb[i].task = current;
if (dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &cb[i].base,
dma_fence_default_wait_cb)) {
--
2.17.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-03 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-03 14:25 [PATCH 00/15] dma-fence cleanup v2 Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 01/15] dma-fence: remove fill_driver_data callback Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 02/15] dma-fence: Make ->enable_signaling optional Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 15:51 ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-04 14:10 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-07 9:35 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2018-05-03 14:25 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 04/15] dma-fence: Make ->wait callback optional Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 8:09 ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-04 8:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 8:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 8:31 ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-04 8:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 9:16 ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-04 9:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 13:17 ` Christian König
2018-05-04 13:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-07-02 8:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-07-02 8:49 ` Christian König
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/amdgpu: Remove unecessary dma_fence_ops Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/etnaviv: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 6:59 ` Christian Gmeiner
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 14:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
[not found] ` <20180503142603.28513-1-daniel.vetter-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/msm: " Daniel Vetter
[not found] ` <20180503142603.28513-10-daniel.vetter-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-04 14:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/nouveau: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/qxl: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/vc4: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 14:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/vgem: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/virtio: " Daniel Vetter
2018-07-03 11:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 15/15] dma-fence: Polish kernel-doc for dma-fence.c Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 14:06 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180503142603.28513-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox