dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/15] dma-fence: Allow wait_any_timeout for all fences
Date: Thu,  3 May 2018 16:25:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180503142603.28513-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180503142603.28513-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

When this was introduced in

commit a519435a96597d8cd96123246fea4ae5a6c90b02
Author: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 20 16:34:16 2015 +0200

    dma-buf/fence: add fence_wait_any_timeout function v2

there was a restriction added that this only works if the dma-fence
uses the dma_fence_default_wait hook. Which works for amdgpu, which is
the only caller. Well, until you share some buffers with e.g. i915,
then you get an -EINVAL.

But there's really no reason for this, because all drivers must
support callbacks. The special ->wait hook is only as an optimization;
if the driver needs to create a worker thread for an active callback,
then it can avoid to do that if it knows that there's a process
context available already. So ->wait is just an optimization, just
using the logic in dma_fence_default_wait() should work for all
drivers.

Let's remove this restriction.

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
index 7b5b40d6b70e..59049375bd19 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
@@ -503,11 +503,6 @@ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout(struct dma_fence **fences, uint32_t count,
 	for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
 		struct dma_fence *fence = fences[i];
 
-		if (fence->ops->wait != dma_fence_default_wait) {
-			ret = -EINVAL;
-			goto fence_rm_cb;
-		}
-
 		cb[i].task = current;
 		if (dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &cb[i].base,
 					   dma_fence_default_wait_cb)) {
-- 
2.17.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-03 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-03 14:25 [PATCH 00/15] dma-fence cleanup v2 Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 01/15] dma-fence: remove fill_driver_data callback Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 02/15] dma-fence: Make ->enable_signaling optional Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 15:51   ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-04 14:10   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-07  9:35     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2018-05-03 14:25 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 04/15] dma-fence: Make ->wait callback optional Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04  8:09   ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-04  8:17     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04  8:23       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04  8:31         ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-04  8:57           ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04  9:16             ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-04  9:25               ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 13:17                 ` Christian König
2018-05-04 13:47                   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-07-02  8:23                     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-07-02  8:49                       ` Christian König
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/amdgpu: Remove unecessary dma_fence_ops Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/etnaviv: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04  6:59   ` Christian Gmeiner
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 14:09   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
     [not found] ` <20180503142603.28513-1-daniel.vetter-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-03 14:25   ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/msm: " Daniel Vetter
     [not found]     ` <20180503142603.28513-10-daniel.vetter-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-04 14:09       ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25   ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/nouveau: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/qxl: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/vc4: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 14:09   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/vgem: " Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/virtio: " Daniel Vetter
2018-07-03 11:14   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:26 ` [PATCH 15/15] dma-fence: Polish kernel-doc for dma-fence.c Daniel Vetter
2018-05-04 14:06   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180503142603.28513-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox