[PATCH v3 2/4] drm/panel: Let of_drm_find_panel() return -ENODEV when the panel is disabled

[Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>]

DT nodes might be present in the DT but with a status property set to
"disabled" or "fail". In this case, we should not return -EPROBE_DEFER
when the caller asks for a drm_panel instance. Return -ENODEV instead.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Add Thierry's A-b/R-b

Changes in v2:
- New commit
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
index 49642d79df8f..1a59c9bd2327 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c
@@ -136,13 +136,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_panel_detach);
  *
  * Return: A pointer to the panel registered for the specified device tree
  * node or an ERR_PTR() if no panel matching the device tree node can be found.
- * The only error that can be reported is -EPROBE_DEFER, meaning that the panel
- * device has not been probed yet, and the caller should retry later.
+ * Possible error codes returned by this function:
+ * - EPROBE_DEFER: the panel device has not been probed yet, and the caller
+ *   should retry later
+ * - ENODEV: the device is not available (status != "okay" or "ok")
  */
 struct drm_panel *of_drm_find_panel(const struct device_node *np)
 {
 	struct drm_panel *panel;
 
+	if (!of_device_is_available(np))
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
 	mutex_lock(&panel_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(panel, &panel_list, list) {
-- 
2.14.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel