From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: remove obsolete comment for ->state
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 11:34:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180704103401.GB496@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180704100506.GT3891@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Wed, 04 Jul 2018, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 10:38:16AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Jul 2018, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > > Jani spotted this when reviewing my earlier patch to remove the driver
> > > > internal usage of this field in
> > > >
> > > > commit 3cf91adaa594e8933af1727942ac560e5c7bc70e
> > > > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > > > Date: Wed Apr 25 19:42:52 2018 +0200
> > > >
> > > > backlight: Nuke BL_CORE_DRIVER1
> > >
> > > FYI, sending patches like this is not a good idea.
> > >
> > > I'll clean it up for you this time, but in future please send patches
> > > properly and place any additional comments you may have below the
> > > '---' line.
> >
> > Ah, I see what you've tried to do. This hurt my eyes! :)
> >
> > It's more conventional to reference commits like:
> >
> > Commit 3cf91adaa594 ("backlight: Nuke BL_CORE_DRIVER1")
> >
> > Again, I'll make the amendment to avoid further confusion.
>
> So the first mail doesn't even bother to explain what's
> objectionable
In the first instance it looked as though you'd copied and pasted `git
log`, which if you'd done so would have been obvious to you and would
have required no further explanation.
Also bear in mind that I took your standing within the kernel
community into consideration, so speaking to you like a n00b or going
into unnecessary detail could have been considered superfluous at best
and condescending at worst.
> the 2nd mail still says "This hurts my eyes!".
It certainly did, yes.
Usually taken to meaning that it was hard to read in these scenarios.
> Over whitespace in the commit message.
Nothing to do with white space. It was the format by which you chose
to reference a previous commit. Instead it looked like a patch
formatting error. I have received patches pasted from `git log`
before, and this looked just the same.
Once I'd realised what was going on, I followed up to explain and
provided some feedback on what to do differently in future.
> This kind of stuff is why graphics people really don't enjoy contributing
> to the kernel at large. A friendly request to resend with the color choice
> adjusted would go a lot further.
I apologise if my brevity hurt your feelings. I have 290 emails to
get though post-paternity leave before I can start to think about
getting some real/paid work done.
> > > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/linux/backlight.h | 1 -
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/backlight.h b/include/linux/backlight.h
> > > > index 7fbf0539e14a..0b5897446dca 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/backlight.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/backlight.h
> > > > @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ struct backlight_properties {
> > > > /* Backlight type */
> > > > enum backlight_type type;
> > > > /* Flags used to signal drivers of state changes */
> > > > - /* Upper 4 bits are reserved for driver internal use */
> > > > unsigned int state;
> > > >
> > > > #define BL_CORE_SUSPENDED (1 << 0) /* backlight is suspended */
> > >
> >
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-04 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-03 14:15 [PATCH] backlight: remove obsolete comment for ->state Daniel Vetter
2018-05-03 14:32 ` Daniel Thompson
2018-07-04 9:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-07-04 9:34 ` Lee Jones
2018-07-04 9:38 ` Lee Jones
2018-07-04 10:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-07-04 10:34 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2018-07-04 11:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-07-04 12:10 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180704103401.GB496@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).