From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/atomic: Use explicit old crtc state in drm_atomic_add_affected_planes()
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:39:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181105143907.GM9144@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17d8505a-d677-3d41-05eb-cefcca91e883@amd.com>
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 02:30:50PM +0000, Wentland, Harry wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-11-05 9:04 a.m., Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 10:26:01AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> >>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> Replace 'crtc->state' with the explicit old crtc state.
> >>>
> >>> Actually it shouldn't matter whether we use the old or the new
> >>> crtc state here since any plane that has been removed from the
> >>> crtc since the crtc state was duplicated will have been added
> >>> to the atomic state already. That is, you can't call
> >>> drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_plane() without having the new
> >>> plane state already in hand.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> I think this will break amdgpu_notify_freesync because that doesn't grab
> >> the crtc state first. Which worked with the old stuff, because adding a
> >> connector or plane will also add it's crtc. But with the new logic we'll
> >> just oops I think.
> >
> > drm_atomic_add_affected_connectors() will add the crtc to the
> > state. So looks like it shouldn't oops.
> >
>
> Thanks. I thought I was too tired on a Monday morning to spot the oops.
>
> This code should be on the way out with the variable refresh patches from Nick. It's currently only used by our DKMS driver.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
>
> Harry
>
> >>
> >> Otoh, it's dead code, so what exactly are amd people doing again :-)
> >
> > Heh. Thanks for the review.
> >
> >>
> >> Adding Harry so he's aware, but patch here looks good.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 4 +++-
> >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> >>> index 3dbfbddae7e6..064c48075917 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> >>> @@ -927,6 +927,8 @@ int
> >>> drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> >>> struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >>> {
> >>> + const struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> >>> + drm_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> >>> struct drm_plane *plane;
> >>>
> >>> WARN_ON(!drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc));
Oh, and if the crtc hadn't been added to the state this WARN would
have already triggered before my change.
> >>> @@ -934,7 +936,7 @@ drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> >>> DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("Adding all current planes for [CRTC:%d:%s] to %p\n",
> >>> crtc->base.id, crtc->name, state);
> >>>
> >>> - drm_for_each_plane_mask(plane, state->dev, crtc->state->plane_mask) {
> >>> + drm_for_each_plane_mask(plane, state->dev, old_crtc_state->plane_mask) {
> >>> struct drm_plane_state *plane_state =
> >>> drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state, plane);
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 2.18.1
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> dri-devel mailing list
> >>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Vetter
> >> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> >> http://blog.ffwll.ch
> >
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-05 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-01 18:46 [PATCH 1/3] drm/atomic: Use explicit old crtc state in drm_atomic_add_affected_planes() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-01 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/atomic: Use explicit old/new state in drm_atomic_crtc_check() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-05 9:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-01 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/atomic: Use explicit old/new state in drm_atomic_plane_check() Ville Syrjala
2018-11-05 9:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-05 14:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-06 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2018-11-05 9:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/atomic: Use explicit old crtc state in drm_atomic_add_affected_planes() Daniel Vetter
2018-11-05 14:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-11-05 14:30 ` Wentland, Harry
2018-11-05 14:39 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181105143907.GM9144@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Harry.Wentland@amd.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox