From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH libdrm] RELEASING: update instructions to use meson instead of autotools
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 21:36:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190218203630.GT2665@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190218174238.2qzj7o5cbpl4aezf@intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 05:42:38PM +0000, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Thursday, 2018-12-20 11:53:11 -0800, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Quoting Eric Engestrom (2018-12-19 08:23:40)
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > RELEASING | 27 ++++++++-------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/RELEASING b/RELEASING
> > > index 7e03e3b9acb1cbfb261a..d1ad8e3b4ad16d4ca14f 100644
> > > --- a/RELEASING
> > > +++ b/RELEASING
> > > @@ -9,25 +9,14 @@ However, this is up to whoever is driving the feature in question.
> > >
> > > Follow these steps to release a new version of libdrm:
> > >
> > > - 1) Bump the version number in configure.ac and meson.build. We seem
> > > - to have settled for 2.4.x as the versioning scheme for libdrm, so
> > > - just bump the micro version.
> > > -
> > > - 2) Run autoconf and then re-run ./configure so the build system
> > > - picks up the new version number.
> > > -
> > > - 3) Verify that the code passes "make distcheck". Running "make
> > > - distcheck" should result in no warnings or errors and end with a
> > > - message of the form:
> > > -
> > > - =============================================
> > > - libdrm-X.Y.Z archives ready for distribution:
> > > - libdrm-X.Y.Z.tar.gz
> > > - libdrm-X.Y.Z.tar.bz2
> > > - =============================================
> > > -
> > > - Make sure that the version number reported by distcheck and in
> > > - the tarball names matches the number you bumped to in configure.ac.
> > > + 1) Bump the version number in meson.build. We seem to have settled for
> > > + 2.4.x as the versioning scheme for libdrm, so just bump the micro
> > > + version.
> > > +
> > > + 2) Run `ninja -C builddir/ dist` to generate the tarballs.
> > > + Make sure that the version number of the tarball name in
> > > + builddir/meson-dist/ matches the number you bumped to. Move that
> > > + tarball to the libdrm repo root for the release script to pick up.
> > >
> > > 4) Push the updated master branch with the bumped version number:
>
> Just noticed I forgot to decrement item 4 & 5 :]
>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Eric
> > >
> >
> > Acked-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
> >
> > But you should probably get someone other than just me to look at this.
>
> There is no "libdrm maintainer", which makes everyone a libdrm
> maintainer :]
>
> If nobody object, I'll push this in a few weeks (there's really no rush,
> but I want to make that move at some point, we have no reason to stay
> dependant on autotools now that we have better tools).
I double-checked that ninja dist does run the tests, so lgtm (with the
numbering adjusted):
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-18 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-19 16:23 [PATCH libdrm] RELEASING: update instructions to use meson instead of autotools Eric Engestrom
2018-12-20 19:53 ` Dylan Baker
2019-02-18 17:42 ` Eric Engestrom
2019-02-18 20:36 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-02-19 11:52 ` Emil Velikov
2019-02-19 12:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-02-19 14:02 ` Eric Engestrom
2019-02-19 15:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-02-19 15:34 ` Dylan Baker
2019-02-19 16:51 ` Emil Velikov
2019-02-19 22:33 ` Dylan Baker
2019-02-21 9:42 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190218203630.GT2665@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dylan@pnwbakers.com \
--cc=eric.engestrom@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox