From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/1] drm/atomic: integrate private objects with suspend/resume helpers
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 06:56:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190315115607.v4avbfbp3hyytsl6@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190315105057.GU2665@phenom.ffwll.local>
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote on Fri [2019-Mar-15 11:50:57 +0100]:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 08:44:45AM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> > During a suspend cycle the atomic state is saved to be used during the
> > restore cycle.
> >
> > However the current state duplication logic does not duplicate private
> > objects. This leads to state inconsistencies at resume time.
> >
> > With private objects modeset lock now integrated, we can make sure that
> > private object state are properly saved and restored.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
>
> Why do you need this? We're doing a full atomic_check, and your
> atomic_check should be pulling in any private state objects and
> recomputing their states. This smells like papering over a driver bug.
I have not seen any atomic_check called during the suspend duplicate
helper. And you are correct normally the private_object state in my case
would get pulled in during a plane atomic_check but that does not happen
here in this step.
Why wouldn't we save all the "state" artifacts so that the whole atomic
state is consistent?
Benoit
>
> The duplicate helpers should only need to duplicate the uapi-relevant
> states, i.e. connector/crtc/planes.
> -Daniel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > index 540a77a2ade9..b108021cc092 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > @@ -3189,6 +3189,7 @@ drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> > struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> > struct drm_plane *plane;
> > struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > + struct drm_private_obj *privobj;
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > state = drm_atomic_state_alloc(dev);
> > @@ -3218,6 +3219,16 @@ drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + drm_for_each_privobj(privobj, dev) {
> > + struct drm_private_state *priv_state;
> > +
> > + priv_state = drm_atomic_get_private_obj_state(state, privobj);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv_state)) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(priv_state);
> > + goto free;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > drm_connector_list_iter_begin(dev, &conn_iter);
> > drm_for_each_connector_iter(conn, &conn_iter) {
> > struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> > @@ -3325,12 +3336,17 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_commit_duplicated_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> > struct drm_connector_state *new_conn_state;
> > struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > + struct drm_private_obj *privobj;
> > + struct drm_private_state *new_priv_state;
> >
> > state->acquire_ctx = ctx;
> >
> > for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, new_plane_state, i)
> > state->planes[i].old_state = plane->state;
> >
> > + for_each_new_private_obj_in_state(state, privobj, new_priv_state, i)
> > + state->private_objs[i].old_state = privobj->state;
> > +
> > for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i)
> > state->crtcs[i].old_state = crtc->state;
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-15 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-14 13:44 [Patch 1/1] drm/atomic: integrate private objects with suspend/resume helpers Benoit Parrot
2019-03-14 15:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-03-14 15:54 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-03-14 18:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-03-15 10:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-15 11:56 ` Benoit Parrot [this message]
2019-03-25 9:06 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190315115607.v4avbfbp3hyytsl6@ti.com \
--to=bparrot@ti.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jsarha@ti.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox