From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm: rcar-du: fix possible object reference leak Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:35:24 +0300 Message-ID: <20190404133524.GC7817@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <1554307455-40361-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> <1554307455-40361-7-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1554307455-40361-7-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wen Yang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wang.yi59@zte.com.cn, Kieran Bingham , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Hi Wen, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:04:14AM +0800, Wen Yang wrote: > The call to of_get_parent returns a node pointer with refcount > incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last > usage. > > Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c:235:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 216, but without a corresponding object release within this function. > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c:236:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 209, but without a corresponding object release within this function. > > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Kieran Bingham > Cc: David Airlie > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c > index afef696..30bceca 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c > @@ -232,6 +232,8 @@ static void __init rcar_du_of_lvds_patch(const struct of_device_id *of_ids) > lvds_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, compatible); > if (lvds_node) { > of_node_put(lvds_node); > + of_node_put(soc_node); > + of_node_put(du_node); > return; Wouldn't it be simpler to just turn the return into a goto done ? > } > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart