Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] ARM: dts: msm8974: add display support

[Brian Masney <masneyb-1iNe0GrtECGEi8DpZVb4nw@public.gmane.org>]

On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 08:00:47PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed 08 May 19:25 PDT 2019, Rob Clark wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 7:16 PM Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 11:39:02PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > On Sun 05 May 06:04 PDT 2019, Brian Masney wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
> > > > [..]
> > > > > +                           clocks = <&mmcc MDSS_MDP_CLK>,
> > > > > +                                    <&mmcc MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
> > > > > +                                    <&mmcc MDSS_AXI_CLK>,
> > > > > +                                    <&mmcc MDSS_BYTE0_CLK>,
> > > > > +                                    <&mmcc MDSS_PCLK0_CLK>,
> > > > > +                                    <&mmcc MDSS_ESC0_CLK>,
> > > > > +                                    <&mmcc MMSS_MISC_AHB_CLK>;
> > > > > +                           clock-names = "mdp_core",
> > > > > +                                         "iface",
> > > > > +                                         "bus",
> > > > > +                                         "byte",
> > > > > +                                         "pixel",
> > > > > +                                         "core",
> > > > > +                                         "core_mmss";
> > > >
> > > > Unless I enable MMSS_MMSSNOC_AXI_CLK and MMSS_S0_AXI_CLK I get some
> > > > underrun error from DSI. You don't see anything like this?
> > > >
> > > > (These clocks are controlled by msm_bus downstream and should be driven
> > > > by interconnect upstream)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Apart from this, I think this looks nice. Happy to see the progress.
> > >
> > > No, I'm not seeing an underrun errors from the DSI. I think the clocks
> > > are fine since I'm able to get this working with 4.17 using these same
> > > clocks. I just sent out v2 and the cover letter has some details, along
> > > with the full dmesg.
> > 
> > since we don't have interconnect driver for 8974, I guess there is
> > some chance that things work or not based on how lk leaves things?
> > 
> 
> Right, I guess the bootloader on my device does not leave the busses
> ticking - perhaps there's a boot splash involved on Brian's device?
> 
> Regardless, this works on Nexus 5 and allows Brian to make further
> progress so I'm all for merging it.

There is a boot splash on the Nexus 5 and that may explain a behavior
that I observed. I attempted to add reset GPIO support to the simple
panel driver and the screen will clear but nothing will come on the
screen after a hard reset, even on 4.17. To be sure, I got the timing
information for how long to leave the GPIO high and low from the
downstream MSM 3.4 sources. That's when I had a script port all of the
~400 panel on commands in the downstream device tree to a new panel
driver.

With the latest kernel kernel having a delay showing the console text,
I observe a brief second where the boot splash is shown along with the
startup text from Linux. A full refresh is performed and the boot
splash goes away. I don't see this with the 4.17 kernel; perhaps maybe
the full refresh occurs quick enough that its not noticeable.

Can you point me to where the interconnect API is in the downstream
MSM 3.4 sources? https://github.com/AICP/kernel_lge_hammerhead
It looks like its in drivers/interconnect/ in the upstream sources.

Brian
_______________________________________________
Freedreno mailing list
Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno