From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis Chamberlain Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/18] kunit: test: add KUnit test runner core Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 20:20:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20190705202051.GB19023@42.do-not-panic.com> References: <20190704003615.204860-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20190704003615.204860-2-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190704003615.204860-2-brendanhiggins@google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Brendan Higgins Cc: frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, keescook@google.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, Tim.Bird@sony.com, amir73il@gmail.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, jdike@addtoit.com, joel@jms.id.au, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, logang@deltatee.com, mpe@ellerma List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 05:35:58PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote: > +struct kunit { > + void *priv; > + > + /* private: internal use only. */ > + const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ > + bool success; /* Read only after test_case finishes! */ > +}; No lock attribute above. > +void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name) > +{ > + spin_lock_init(&test->lock); > + test->name = name; > + test->success = true; > +} And yet here you initialize a spin lock... This won't compile. Seems you forgot to remove this line. So I guess a re-spin is better. Luis