From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] drm: Rename drm_bridge_timings to drm_timings Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:14:40 +0300 Message-ID: <20190815141440.GA20322@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <1565867073-24746-1-git-send-email-fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> <1565867073-24746-4-git-send-email-fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> <20190815131838.GP5011@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20190815140400.GA7174@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190815140400.GA7174@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Fabrizio Castro , Andrzej Hajda , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Sean Paul , Eric Anholt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Simon Horman , Geert Uytterhoeven , Chris Paterson , Biju Das , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Kieran Bingham , Jacopo Mondi List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:04:00PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:18:38PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Fabrizio, > > > > (CC'ing Greg as the architect of the SPDX move) > > _one of_, not the one that did the most of he work, that would be Thomas :) > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:04:27PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote: > > > The information represented by drm_bridge_timings is also > > > needed by panels, therefore rename drm_bridge_timings to > > > drm_timings. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro > > > Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg43271.html > > > > > > --- > > > v1->v2: > > > * new patch > > > > > > I have copied the license from include/drm/drm_bridge.h as that's > > > where the struct originally came from. What's the right SPDX license > > > to use in this case? > > > > https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Decisions/Dealing_with_Public_Domain_within_SPDX_Files > > > > Greg, any idea on how we should handle this ? > > Ugh, what lunacy. But drm_bridge.h is NOT under any "public domain" > license, so why is that an issue here? This looks like a "normal" bsd 3 > clause license to me, right? You're right, I overread part of the text in drm_bridge.h, it seems to indeed be covered by a BSD 3 clause license. Sorry for the noise. > So I would just use "BSD-3-Clause" as the SPDX license here, if I were > doing this patch... -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart