From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:22:07 -0700
Message-ID: <20190917002207.GJ237523@dtor-ws>
References: <20190911075215.78047-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdb=s67w2DCGubhbLQTtxpWtiW8S1MECMO4cvec=bF6OdA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdb=s67w2DCGubhbLQTtxpWtiW8S1MECMO4cvec=bF6OdA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>, Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>, Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, open list:DRM PANEL DR
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > If we agree in principle, I would like to have the very first 3 patches
> > in an immutable branch off maybe -rc8 so that it can be pulled into
> > individual subsystems so that patches switching various drivers to
> > fwnode_gpiod_get_index() could be applied.
> 
> I think it seems a bit enthusiastic to have non-GPIO subsystems
> pick up these changes this close to the merge window so my plan
> is to merge patches 1.2.3 (1 already merged) and then you could
> massage the other subsystems in v5.4-rc1.
> 
> But if other subsystems say "hey we want do fix this in like 3 days"
> then I'm game for an immutable branch as well.

No, if it is still has a chance for -rc1 then I'm good. I was thinking
if it does not go into -rc1 I could convince some of them merge a
targeted immutable branch off -rc8 or 5.3 final and then apply patches
relevant to their subsystems so we do not have to wait till 5.6 to land
everything.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry