From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/24] goldish_pipe: rename local pin_user_pages() routine Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:08:31 -0800 Message-ID: <20191121080831.GD30991@infradead.org> References: <20191121071354.456618-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20191121071354.456618-7-jhubbard@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191121071354.456618-7-jhubbard@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: John Hubbard Cc: Andrew Morton , Al Viro , Alex Williamson , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Daniel Vetter , Dave Chinner , David Airlie , "David S . Miller" , Ira Weiny , Jan Kara , Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Jonathan Corbet , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Magnus Karlsson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Micha List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:13:36PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote: > +static int pin_goldfish_pages(unsigned long first_page, > + unsigned long last_page, > + unsigned int last_page_size, > + int is_write, > + struct page *pages[MAX_BUFFERS_PER_COMMAND], > + unsigned int *iter_last_page_size) Why not goldfish_pin_pages? Normally we put the module / subsystem in front. Also can we get this queued up for 5.5 to get some trivial changes out of the way?