dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Anderson <thomasanderson@google.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com>,
	intel-gfc@freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [v3,1/4] drm/edid: Abstract away cea_edid_modes[]
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:06:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210230610.GA24882@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210223423.GA85292@google.com>

+CCs that were accidnetally lost

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 02:34:23PM -0800, Tom Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:54:59PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > We're going to need two cea mode tables (on for VICs < 128,
> 
> s/on/one
> 
> > another one for VICs >= 193). To that end replace the direct
> > edid_cea_modes[] lookups with a function call. And we'll rename
> > the array to edid_cea_modes_0[] to indicathe how it's to be
> 
> s/indicathe/indicate
> 
> > indexed.
> > 
> > Cc: Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com>
> > Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > index 3c9703b08491..b700fc075257 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > @@ -707,12 +707,11 @@ static const struct minimode extra_modes[] = {
> >  };
> >  
> >  /*
> > - * Probably taken from CEA-861 spec.
> > - * This table is converted from xorg's hw/xfree86/modes/xf86EdidModes.c.
> > + * From CEA/CTA-861 spec.
> >   *
> > - * Index using the VIC.
> > + * Index with VIC.
> >   */
> > -static const struct drm_display_mode edid_cea_modes[] = {
> > +static const struct drm_display_mode edid_cea_modes_0[] = {
> 
> Nit: The "_0" suffix is a bit odd. Maybe edid_cea_modes_{lo,hi}, but I'm not
> sure if that's actually better. Up to you.
> 
> >  	/* 0 - dummy, VICs start at 1 */
> >  	{ },
> >  	/* 1 - 640x480@60Hz 4:3 */
> > @@ -3067,6 +3066,25 @@ static u8 *drm_find_cea_extension(const struct edid *edid)
> >  	return cea;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static const struct drm_display_mode *cea_mode_for_vic(u8 vic)
> > +{
> > +	if (!vic)
> > +		return NULL;
> > +	if (vic < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_0))
> > +		return &edid_cea_modes_0[vic];
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u8 cea_num_vics(void)
> > +{
> > +	return ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u8 cea_next_vic(u8 vic)
> > +{
> > +	return vic + 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Calculate the alternate clock for the CEA mode
> >   * (60Hz vs. 59.94Hz etc.)
> > @@ -3104,14 +3122,14 @@ cea_mode_alternate_timings(u8 vic, struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> >  	 * get the other variants by simply increasing the
> >  	 * vertical front porch length.
> >  	 */
> > -	BUILD_BUG_ON(edid_cea_modes[8].vtotal != 262 ||
> > -		     edid_cea_modes[9].vtotal != 262 ||
> > -		     edid_cea_modes[12].vtotal != 262 ||
> > -		     edid_cea_modes[13].vtotal != 262 ||
> > -		     edid_cea_modes[23].vtotal != 312 ||
> > -		     edid_cea_modes[24].vtotal != 312 ||
> > -		     edid_cea_modes[27].vtotal != 312 ||
> > -		     edid_cea_modes[28].vtotal != 312);
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(cea_mode_for_vic(8)->vtotal != 262 ||
> > +		     cea_mode_for_vic(9)->vtotal != 262 ||
> > +		     cea_mode_for_vic(12)->vtotal != 262 ||
> > +		     cea_mode_for_vic(13)->vtotal != 262 ||
> > +		     cea_mode_for_vic(23)->vtotal != 312 ||
> > +		     cea_mode_for_vic(24)->vtotal != 312 ||
> > +		     cea_mode_for_vic(27)->vtotal != 312 ||
> > +		     cea_mode_for_vic(28)->vtotal != 312);
> >  
> >  	if (((vic == 8 || vic == 9 ||
> >  	      vic == 12 || vic == 13) && mode->vtotal < 263) ||
> > @@ -3139,10 +3157,16 @@ static u8 drm_match_cea_mode_clock_tolerance(const struct drm_display_mode *to_m
> >  	if (to_match->picture_aspect_ratio)
> >  		match_flags |= DRM_MODE_MATCH_ASPECT_RATIO;
> >  
> > -	for (vic = 1; vic < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes); vic++) {
> > -		struct drm_display_mode cea_mode = edid_cea_modes[vic];
> > +	for (vic = 1; vic < cea_num_vics(); vic = cea_next_vic(vic)) {
> > +		const struct drm_display_mode *mode = cea_mode_for_vic(vic);
> > +		struct drm_display_mode cea_mode;
> >  		unsigned int clock1, clock2;
> >  
> > +		if (!mode)
> > +			continue;
> 
> Isn't this check is a no-op now that we have cea_next_vic()?
> 
> > +
> > +		cea_mode = *mode;
> > +
> 
> Get rid of |cea_mode| and use *mode. There's only 1 place where cea_mode.*
> was used, and 3 places where &cea_mode was used, so using a pointer seems
> better.
> 
> >  		/* Check both 60Hz and 59.94Hz */
> >  		clock1 = cea_mode.clock;
> >  		clock2 = cea_mode_alternate_clock(&cea_mode);
> > @@ -3178,10 +3202,16 @@ u8 drm_match_cea_mode(const struct drm_display_mode *to_match)
> >  	if (to_match->picture_aspect_ratio)
> >  		match_flags |= DRM_MODE_MATCH_ASPECT_RATIO;
> >  
> > -	for (vic = 1; vic < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes); vic++) {
> > -		struct drm_display_mode cea_mode = edid_cea_modes[vic];
> > +	for (vic = 1; vic < cea_num_vics(); vic = cea_next_vic(vic)) {
> > +		const struct drm_display_mode *mode = cea_mode_for_vic(vic);
> > +		struct drm_display_mode cea_mode;
> >  		unsigned int clock1, clock2;
> >  
> > +		if (!mode)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		cea_mode = *mode;
> > +
> 
> Same 2 comments as above.
> 
> >  		/* Check both 60Hz and 59.94Hz */
> >  		clock1 = cea_mode.clock;
> >  		clock2 = cea_mode_alternate_clock(&cea_mode);
> > @@ -3202,7 +3232,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_match_cea_mode);
> >  
> >  static bool drm_valid_cea_vic(u8 vic)
> >  {
> > -	return vic > 0 && vic < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes);
> > +	return cea_mode_for_vic(vic) != NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -3214,7 +3244,13 @@ static bool drm_valid_cea_vic(u8 vic)
> >   */
> >  enum hdmi_picture_aspect drm_get_cea_aspect_ratio(const u8 video_code)
> >  {
> > -	return edid_cea_modes[video_code].picture_aspect_ratio;
> > +	const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> > +
> > +	mode = cea_mode_for_vic(video_code);
> 
> Nit: do declaration and assignment for |mode| on the same line?
> 
> > +	if (mode)
> > +		return mode->picture_aspect_ratio;
> > +
> > +	return HDMI_PICTURE_ASPECT_NONE;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_get_cea_aspect_ratio);
> >  
> > @@ -3323,7 +3359,7 @@ add_alternate_cea_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid)
> >  		unsigned int clock1, clock2;
> >  
> >  		if (drm_valid_cea_vic(vic)) {
> > -			cea_mode = &edid_cea_modes[vic];
> > +			cea_mode = cea_mode_for_vic(vic);
> >  			clock2 = cea_mode_alternate_clock(cea_mode);
> >  		} else {
> >  			vic = drm_match_hdmi_mode(mode);
> > @@ -3398,7 +3434,7 @@ drm_display_mode_from_vic_index(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >  	if (!drm_valid_cea_vic(vic))
> >  		return NULL;
> >  
> > -	newmode = drm_mode_duplicate(dev, &edid_cea_modes[vic]);
> > +	newmode = drm_mode_duplicate(dev, cea_mode_for_vic(vic));
> >  	if (!newmode)
> >  		return NULL;
> >  
> > @@ -3432,7 +3468,7 @@ static int do_y420vdb_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >  		if (!drm_valid_cea_vic(vic))
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > -		newmode = drm_mode_duplicate(dev, &edid_cea_modes[vic]);
> > +		newmode = drm_mode_duplicate(dev, cea_mode_for_vic(vic));
> >  		if (!newmode)
> >  			break;
> >  		bitmap_set(hdmi->y420_vdb_modes, vic, 1);
> > @@ -4001,7 +4037,7 @@ static void fixup_detailed_cea_mode_clock(struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> >  	vic = drm_match_cea_mode_clock_tolerance(mode, 5);
> >  	if (drm_valid_cea_vic(vic)) {
> >  		type = "CEA";
> > -		cea_mode = &edid_cea_modes[vic];
> > +		cea_mode = cea_mode_for_vic(vic);
> >  		clock1 = cea_mode->clock;
> >  		clock2 = cea_mode_alternate_clock(cea_mode);
> >  	} else {
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-11  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-25 13:54 [PATCH v3 0/4] drm/edid: Add new modes from CTA-861-G Ville Syrjala
2019-09-25 13:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/edid: Abstract away cea_edid_modes[] Ville Syrjala
2019-10-03  8:16   ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-10-03 13:55     ` Ville Syrjälä
     [not found]   ` <20191210223423.GA85292@google.com>
2019-12-10 23:06     ` Tom Anderson [this message]
2019-09-25 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/edid: Add CTA-861-G modes with VIC >= 193 Ville Syrjala
2019-09-27 21:35   ` Manasi Navare
2019-10-03  8:22   ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-10-03 14:15     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-10 23:16   ` [v3,2/4] " Tom Anderson
2019-09-25 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/edid: Throw away the dummy VIC 0 cea mode Ville Syrjala
2019-10-03  8:29   ` Sharma, Shashank
2019-10-03 14:16     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-10 23:18   ` [v3,3/4] " Tom Anderson
2019-12-11 11:07     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-25 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/edid: Make sure the CEA mode arrays have the correct amount of modes Ville Syrjala
2019-09-27 21:38   ` Manasi Navare
2019-12-10 23:20   ` [v3,4/4] " Tom Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191210230610.GA24882@google.com \
    --to=thomasanderson@google.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hansverk@cisco.com \
    --cc=intel-gfc@freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox