From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D7CC54FD0 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:36:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 134A6208E4 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:36:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 134A6208E4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3802A6E155; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com (alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.39]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BAFB89FD4; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg03-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.143]) by alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2020 16:37:56 -0700 Received: from gurus-linux.qualcomm.com ([10.46.162.81]) by ironmsg03-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2020 16:37:55 -0700 Received: by gurus-linux.qualcomm.com (Postfix, from userid 383780) id 38ACE4C87; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:37:55 -0700 From: Guru Das Srinagesh To: Daniel Thompson Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64 Message-ID: <20200422233755.GA11597@codeaurora.org> References: <20200422084934.ajh6yzs5mkzzvop4@holly.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200422084934.ajh6yzs5mkzzvop4@holly.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:36:39 +0000 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kate Stewart , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, David Collins , Liam Girdwood , David Airlie , Michael Turquette , Kamil Debski , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Chris Wilson , Atish Patra , Thierry Reding , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Alexander Shiyan , Lee Jones , Chen-Yu Tsai , NXP Linux Team , Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Sascha Hauer , Guenter Roeck , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , Alexandre Torgue , Arnd Bergmann , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Mark Brown , Paul Walmsley , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , Thomas Gleixner , Fabrice Gasnier , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Allison Randal , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Coquelin , Richard Fontana , Stephen Boyd , Jingoo Han , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yash Shah , Palmer Dabbelt , Dan Carpenter , Joe Perches , Shawn Guo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:57:12PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote: > > [REQUEST] > > > > Would it be possible for the patches that have already received Acked-by's in > > this series to be accepted and applied to the tree? I lost an Acked-by (in > > intel-panel.c) because it had a merge conflict with a new change that came in > > after I rebased to tip. I wasn't sure earlier about accepting single patches as > > opposed to the entire series en masse, but this event has got me thinking. > > Has there been a positive maintainer review of patch 11 at any point in > the thread (most of the people you are asking to commit patches have > not been able to see the discussion about the actual feature these > patches are preparing for)? Yes. Uwe had this to say [1] about a previous patchset (v5) of patch 11 which is essentially unchanged in this patchset save the dropping of the pwm_capture change. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pwm/msg11536.html Thank you. Guru Das. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel