From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038DCC55185 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 08:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D52042071E for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 08:43:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D52042071E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D55F6E1CD; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 08:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com (alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.38]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 741A96E0DA; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg01-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.141]) by alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2020 15:14:23 -0700 Received: from gurus-linux.qualcomm.com ([10.46.162.81]) by ironmsg01-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2020 15:14:22 -0700 Received: by gurus-linux.qualcomm.com (Postfix, from userid 383780) id 9498C4C8D; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:14:22 -0700 From: Guru Das Srinagesh To: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64 Message-ID: <20200424221422.GA31118@codeaurora.org> References: <20200423114857.GG3612@dell> <20200423215306.GA8670@codeaurora.org> <20200424064303.GJ3612@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200424064303.GJ3612@dell> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 08:42:24 +0000 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kate Stewart , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, David Collins , Liam Girdwood , David Airlie , Michael Turquette , Kamil Debski , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Chris Wilson , Atish Patra , Thierry Reding , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Thompson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Alexander Shiyan , Chen-Yu Tsai , NXP Linux Team , Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Sascha Hauer , Guenter Roeck , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , Alexandre Torgue , Arnd Bergmann , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Mark Brown , Paul Walmsley , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , Thomas Gleixner , Fabrice Gasnier , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Allison Randal , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Coquelin , Richard Fontana , Stephen Boyd , Jingoo Han , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yash Shah , Palmer Dabbelt , Dan Carpenter , Joe Perches , Shawn Guo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 07:43:03AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > A great deal of mailing lists contain numerous protections against > things like flooding and spamming. One of those protections is a > check for "Too many recipients to the message". Most of the time this > simply requires moderator intervention by way of review and approval, > but this ultimately depends on the ML's configuration. > > The first thing to ascertain is why your recipients list is so large. > Have you added every reviewer, subsystem-maintainer, maintainer and > contributor suggested by get-maintainer.pl? If so, consider pruning > that a little. Contributors do not tend to care about subsequent > changes to a file. As someone who receives a lot of patches, I tend > to get fed-up when receiving patches simply because I made a change X > years ago. Stick to listed maintainers/reviewers in the first > instance and see how far that takes you. Thank you for the detailed reply. I did this in the first few patchsets and then when a few patches didn't get any attention, expanded the audience thus. Still, around 50% of the patches in this series remain unreviewed by anyone. > If your recipients list is as succinct as reasonably possible, maybe > just accept that every version isn't going to be archived by every > ML. It's still much more useful for the correct people to have > visibility into the set than for it to be archived multiple times. Thank you, will prune the list and remove past contributors from the Cc-list and add all parties to all patches. Thank you. Guru Das. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel