dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: malat@debian.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [bug report] drm/dp: annotate implicit fall throughs
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:27:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825112759.GA287100@mwanda> (raw)

Hello Mathieu Malaterre,

The patch e9c0c874711b: "drm/dp: annotate implicit fall throughs"
from Jan 14, 2019, leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c:495 drm_dp_downstream_max_bpc()
	warn: ignoring unreachable code.

drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
   467  int drm_dp_downstream_max_bpc(const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE],
   468                                const u8 port_cap[4])
   469  {
   470          int type = port_cap[0] & DP_DS_PORT_TYPE_MASK;
   471          bool detailed_cap_info = dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] &
   472                  DP_DETAILED_CAP_INFO_AVAILABLE;
   473          int bpc;
   474  
   475          if (!detailed_cap_info)
   476                  return 0;
   477  
   478          switch (type) {
   479          case DP_DS_PORT_TYPE_VGA:
   480          case DP_DS_PORT_TYPE_DVI:
   481          case DP_DS_PORT_TYPE_HDMI:
   482          case DP_DS_PORT_TYPE_DP_DUALMODE:
   483                  bpc = port_cap[2] & DP_DS_MAX_BPC_MASK;
                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is 0x3.

   484  
   485                  switch (bpc) {
   486                  case DP_DS_8BPC:
   487                          return 8;
   488                  case DP_DS_10BPC:
   489                          return 10;
   490                  case DP_DS_12BPC:
   491                          return 12;
   492                  case DP_DS_16BPC:
   493                          return 16;
   494                  }
   495                  fallthrough;

This fallthrough is impossible.  Probably the way to work around the
bogus warning is the change the fallthough to "return 0; /* impossible */"
otherwise the fallthrough is sort of misleading...

   496          default:
   497                  return 0;
   498          }
   499  }

regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-25 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-25 11:27 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-08-28  9:53 ` [bug report] drm/dp: annotate implicit fall throughs Jani Nikula
2020-08-31  9:06   ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200825112759.GA287100@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=malat@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox