From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 09/42] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:57:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210720205802.39610-10-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210720205802.39610-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Taking a PM reference to prevent intel_gt_wait_for_idle from short
circuiting while a deregister context H2G is in flight.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.h | 5 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h | 13 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 4 +
.../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 98 +++++++++++++++----
4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.h
index 70ea46d6cfb0..17a5028ea177 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.h
@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ intel_engine_pm_is_awake(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
return intel_wakeref_is_active(&engine->wakeref);
}
+static inline void __intel_engine_pm_get(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+ __intel_wakeref_get(&engine->wakeref);
+}
+
static inline void intel_engine_pm_get(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
intel_wakeref_get(&engine->wakeref);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h
index d0588d8aaa44..a17bf0d4592b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h
@@ -41,6 +41,19 @@ static inline void intel_gt_pm_put_async(struct intel_gt *gt)
intel_wakeref_put_async(>->wakeref);
}
+#define with_intel_gt_pm(gt, tmp) \
+ for (tmp = 1, intel_gt_pm_get(gt); tmp; \
+ intel_gt_pm_put(gt), tmp = 0)
+#define with_intel_gt_pm_async(gt, tmp) \
+ for (tmp = 1, intel_gt_pm_get(gt); tmp; \
+ intel_gt_pm_put_async(gt), tmp = 0)
+#define with_intel_gt_pm_if_awake(gt, tmp) \
+ for (tmp = intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake(gt); tmp; \
+ intel_gt_pm_put(gt), tmp = 0)
+#define with_intel_gt_pm_if_awake_async(gt, tmp) \
+ for (tmp = intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake(gt); tmp; \
+ intel_gt_pm_put_async(gt), tmp = 0)
+
static inline int intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(struct intel_gt *gt)
{
return intel_wakeref_wait_for_idle(>->wakeref);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
index 3198480f717c..4fe7fd4ce10e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
@@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ struct intel_guc {
struct list_head guc_id_list_no_ref;
struct list_head guc_id_list_unpinned;
+ spinlock_t destroy_lock;
+ struct list_head destroyed_contexts;
+ struct work_struct destroy_worker;
+
bool submission_supported;
bool submission_selected;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index e1a35f647025..f13558adc142 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -908,6 +908,7 @@ static void scrub_guc_desc_for_outstanding_g2h(struct intel_guc *guc)
if (deregister)
guc_signal_context_fence(ce);
if (destroyed) {
+ intel_gt_pm_put_async(guc_to_gt(guc));
release_guc_id(guc, ce);
__guc_context_destroy(ce);
}
@@ -1026,6 +1027,8 @@ static void guc_flush_submissions(struct intel_guc *guc)
gse_flush_submissions(guc->gse[i]);
}
+static void guc_flush_destroyed_contexts(struct intel_guc *guc);
+
void intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
int i;
@@ -1043,6 +1046,7 @@ void intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare(struct intel_guc *guc)
spin_unlock_irq(&guc_to_gt(guc)->irq_lock);
guc_flush_submissions(guc);
+ guc_flush_destroyed_contexts(guc);
/*
* Handle any outstanding G2Hs before reset. Call IRQ handler directly
@@ -1368,6 +1372,8 @@ static void retire_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
static int guc_lrcd_reg_init(struct intel_guc *guc);
static void guc_lrcd_reg_fini(struct intel_guc *guc);
+static void destroy_worker_func(struct work_struct *w);
+
/*
* Set up the memory resources to be shared with the GuC (via the GGTT)
* at firmware loading time.
@@ -1390,6 +1396,10 @@ int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&guc->guc_id_list_unpinned);
ida_init(&guc->guc_ids);
+ spin_lock_init(&guc->destroy_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&guc->destroyed_contexts);
+ INIT_WORK(&guc->destroy_worker, destroy_worker_func);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1400,6 +1410,7 @@ void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
if (!guc_submission_initialized(guc))
return;
+ guc_flush_destroyed_contexts(guc);
guc_lrcd_reg_fini(guc);
for (i = 0; i < GUC_SUBMIT_ENGINE_MAX; ++i) {
@@ -2326,11 +2337,29 @@ static void guc_context_sched_disable(struct intel_context *ce)
static inline void guc_lrc_desc_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
+ struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool disabled;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_gt_pm_is_awake(gt));
GEM_BUG_ON(!lrc_desc_registered(guc, ce->guc_id));
GEM_BUG_ON(ce != __get_context(guc, ce->guc_id));
GEM_BUG_ON(context_enabled(ce));
+ /* Seal race with Reset */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
+ disabled = submission_disabled(guc);
+ if (likely(!disabled)) {
+ __intel_gt_pm_get(gt);
+ set_context_destroyed(ce);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
+ if (unlikely(disabled)) {
+ release_guc_id(guc, ce);
+ __guc_context_destroy(ce);
+ return;
+ }
+
clr_context_registered(ce);
deregister_context(ce, ce->guc_id, true);
}
@@ -2359,12 +2388,51 @@ static void __guc_context_destroy(struct intel_context *ce)
}
}
+static void guc_flush_destroyed_contexts(struct intel_guc *guc)
+{
+ struct intel_context *ce, *cn;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->destroy_lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(ce, cn,
+ &guc->destroyed_contexts, guc_id_link) {
+ list_del_init(&ce->guc_id_link);
+ release_guc_id(guc, ce);
+ __guc_context_destroy(ce);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->destroy_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void deregister_destroyed_contexts(struct intel_guc *guc)
+{
+ struct intel_context *ce, *cn;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->destroy_lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(ce, cn,
+ &guc->destroyed_contexts, guc_id_link) {
+ list_del_init(&ce->guc_id_link);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->destroy_lock, flags);
+ guc_lrc_desc_unpin(ce);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->destroy_lock, flags);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->destroy_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void destroy_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
+{
+ struct intel_guc *guc =
+ container_of(w, struct intel_guc, destroy_worker);
+ struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
+ int tmp;
+
+ with_intel_gt_pm(gt, tmp)
+ deregister_destroyed_contexts(guc);
+}
+
static void guc_context_destroy(struct kref *kref)
{
struct intel_context *ce = container_of(kref, typeof(*ce), ref);
- struct intel_runtime_pm *runtime_pm = ce->engine->uncore->rpm;
struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
- intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
unsigned long flags;
bool disabled;
@@ -2404,12 +2472,12 @@ static void guc_context_destroy(struct kref *kref)
list_del_init(&ce->guc_id_link);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->contexts_lock, flags);
- /* Seal race with Reset */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
+ /* Seal race with reset */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->destroy_lock, flags);
disabled = submission_disabled(guc);
if (likely(!disabled))
- set_context_destroyed(ce);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
+ list_add_tail(&ce->guc_id_link, &guc->destroyed_contexts);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->destroy_lock, flags);
if (unlikely(disabled)) {
release_guc_id(guc, ce);
__guc_context_destroy(ce);
@@ -2417,20 +2485,11 @@ static void guc_context_destroy(struct kref *kref)
}
/*
- * We defer GuC context deregistration until the context is destroyed
- * in order to save on CTBs. With this optimization ideally we only need
- * 1 CTB to register the context during the first pin and 1 CTB to
- * deregister the context when the context is destroyed. Without this
- * optimization, a CTB would be needed every pin & unpin.
- *
- * XXX: Need to acqiure the runtime wakeref as this can be triggered
- * from context_free_worker when runtime wakeref is not held.
- * guc_lrc_desc_unpin requires the runtime as a GuC register is written
- * in H2G CTB to deregister the context. A future patch may defer this
- * H2G CTB if the runtime wakeref is zero.
+ * We use a worker to issue the H2G to deregister the context as we can
+ * take the GT PM for the first time which isn't allowed from an atomic
+ * context.
*/
- with_intel_runtime_pm(runtime_pm, wakeref)
- guc_lrc_desc_unpin(ce);
+ queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &guc->destroy_worker);
}
static int guc_context_alloc(struct intel_context *ce)
@@ -3441,6 +3500,7 @@ int intel_guc_deregister_done_process_msg(struct intel_guc *guc,
intel_context_put(ce);
} else if (context_destroyed(ce)) {
/* Context has been destroyed */
+ intel_gt_pm_put_async(guc_to_gt(guc));
release_guc_id(guc, ce);
__guc_context_destroy(ce);
}
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-20 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-20 20:57 [RFC PATCH 00/42] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 01/42] drm/i915/guc: GuC submission squashed into single patch Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 02/42] drm/i915/guc: Allow flexible number of context ids Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 03/42] drm/i915/guc: Connect the number of guc_ids to debugfs Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 04/42] drm/i915/guc: Don't return -EAGAIN to user when guc_ids exhausted Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 05/42] drm/i915/guc: Don't allow requests not ready to consume all guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 06/42] drm/i915/guc: Introduce guc_submit_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 07/42] drm/i915/guc: Check return of __xa_store when registering a context Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 08/42] drm/i915/guc: Non-static lrc descriptor registration buffer Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 10/42] drm/i915: Add GT PM unpark worker Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 11/42] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 12/42] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 13/42] drm/i915/guc: Selftest for GuC flow control Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 14/42] drm/i915: Add logical engine mapping Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 15/42] drm/i915: Expose logical engine instance to user Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 16/42] drm/i915/guc: Introduce context parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 17/42] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC parent-child context pin / unpin functions Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 18/42] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 19/42] drm/i915/guc: Ensure GuC schedule operations do not operate on child contexts Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 20/42] drm/i915/guc: Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 21/42] drm/i915/guc: Add hang check to GuC submit engine Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 22/42] drm/i915/guc: Add guc_child_context_destroy Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 23/42] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 24/42] drm/i915/guc: Insert submit fences between requests in parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 25/42] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc reset Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 26/42] drm/i915/guc: Update debugfs for GuC multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 27/42] drm/i915: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 28/42] drm/i915/guc: Add basic GuC multi-lrc selftest Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 29/42] drm/i915/guc: Implement BB boundary preemption for multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 30/42] i915/drm: Move secure execbuf check to execbuf2 Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 31/42] drm/i915: Move input/exec fence handling to i915_gem_execbuffer2 Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 32/42] drm/i915: Move output " Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 33/42] drm/i915: Return output fence from i915_gem_do_execbuffer Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 34/42] drm/i915: Store batch index in struct i915_execbuffer Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 35/42] drm/i915: Allow callers of i915_gem_do_execbuffer to override the batch index Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 36/42] drm/i915: Teach execbuf there can be more than one batch in the objects list Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 37/42] drm/i915: Only track object dependencies on first request Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 38/42] drm/i915: Force parallel contexts to use copy engine for reloc Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:57 ` [RFC PATCH 39/42] drm/i915: Multi-batch execbuffer2 Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:58 ` [RFC PATCH 40/42] drm/i915: Eliminate unnecessary VMA calls for multi-BB submission Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:58 ` [RFC PATCH 41/42] drm/i915: Enable multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-07-20 20:58 ` [RFC PATCH 42/42] drm/i915/execlists: Parallel submission support for execlists Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210720205802.39610-10-matthew.brost@intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox