dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@collabora.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Add PANFROST_BO_NO{READ,WRITE} flags
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 08:47:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211001084740.051e9d80@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YVY2O48ckub2fc5W@maud>

On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:12:11 -0400
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@collabora.com> wrote:

> > > > +	/* Executable implies readable */
> > > > +	if ((args->flags & PANFROST_BO_NOREAD) &&
> > > > +	    !(args->flags & PANFROST_BO_NOEXEC))
> > > > +		return -EINVAL;    
> > > 
> > > Generally, executable also implies not-writeable. Should we check that?  
> > 
> > We were allowing it until now, so doing that would break the backward
> > compat, unfortunately.  
> 
> Not a problem if you only enforce this starting with the appropriate
> UABI version, but...

I still don't see how that solves the <old-userspace,new-kernel>
situation, since old-userspace doesn't know about the new UABI, and
there's no version field on the CREATE_BO ioctl() to let the kernel
know about the UABI used by this userspace program. I mean, we could
add one, or add a new PANFROST_BO_EXTENDED_FLAGS flag to enforce this
'noexec implies nowrite' behavior, but is it really simpler than
explicitly passing the NOWRITE flag when NOEXEC is passed?

> 
> > Steve also mentioned that the DDK might use shaders modifying other
> > shaders here [1]  
> 
> What? I believe it, but what?
> 
> For the case of pilot shaders, that shouldn't require self-modifying
> code. As I understand, the DDK binds the push uniform (FAU / RMU) buffer
> as global shader memory (SSBO) and uses regular STORE instructions on
> it. That requires writability on that BO but that should be fine.

Okay.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-01  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-30 18:47 [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Add PANFROST_BO_NO{READ,WRITE} flags Boris Brezillon
2021-09-30 19:13 ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2021-09-30 19:40   ` Boris Brezillon
2021-09-30 22:12     ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2021-10-01  6:47       ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2021-10-01 11:48         ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2021-10-01 12:09       ` Steven Price
2021-09-30 19:44 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-10-01  7:06   ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211001084740.051e9d80@collabora.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com \
    --cc=alyssa@collabora.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox