dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	matthew.auld@intel.com,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Attempt to avoid dma-fence-[chain|array] lockdep splats
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:19:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211130121936.586031-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Introducing more usage of dma-fence-chain and dma-fence-array in the
i915 driver we start to hit lockdep splats due to the recursive fence
locking in the dma-fence-chain and dma-fence-array containers.
This is a humble suggestion to try to establish a dma-fence locking order
(patch 1) and to avoid excessive recursive locking in these containers
(patch 2)

Thomas Hellström (2):
  dma-fence: Avoid establishing a locking order between fence classes
  dma-fence: Avoid excessive recursive fence locking from
    enable_signaling() callbacks

 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c | 23 +++++++--
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c | 12 ++++-
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c       | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 include/linux/dma-fence.h         |  4 ++
 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-11-30 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-30 12:19 Thomas Hellström [this message]
2021-11-30 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] dma-fence: Avoid establishing a locking order between fence classes Thomas Hellström
2021-11-30 12:25   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-30 12:31     ` Thomas Hellström
2021-11-30 12:42       ` Christian König
2021-11-30 12:56         ` Thomas Hellström
2021-11-30 13:26           ` Christian König
2021-11-30 14:35             ` Thomas Hellström
2021-11-30 15:02               ` Christian König
2021-11-30 18:12                 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-11-30 19:27                   ` Thomas Hellström
2021-12-01  7:05                     ` Christian König
2021-12-01  8:23                       ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-12-01  8:36                         ` Christian König
2021-12-01 10:15                           ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-12-01 10:32                             ` Christian König
2021-12-01 11:04                               ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-12-01 11:25                                 ` Christian König
2021-12-01 12:16                                   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-12-03 13:08                                     ` Christian König
2021-12-03 14:18                                       ` Thomas Hellström
2021-12-03 14:26                                         ` Christian König
2021-12-03 14:50                                           ` Thomas Hellström
2021-12-03 15:00                                             ` Christian König
2021-12-03 15:13                                               ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-12-07 18:08                                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-12-07 20:46                                           ` Thomas Hellström
2021-12-20  9:37                                             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-11-30 12:32   ` Thomas Hellström
2021-11-30 12:19 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] dma-fence: Avoid excessive recursive fence locking from enable_signaling() callbacks Thomas Hellström
2021-11-30 12:36 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Attempt to avoid dma-fence-[chain|array] lockdep splats Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211130121936.586031-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).