From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com>
To: "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: "thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com"
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Cheng, Michael" <michael.cheng@intel.com>,
"airlied@linux.ie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Wilson, Chris P" <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>,
"andi.shyti@linux.intel.com" <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
"mchehab@kernel.org" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Auld, Matthew" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915: pass a pointer for tlb seqno at vma_invalidate_tlb()
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:29:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220809082922.2dbd6c0c@maurocar-mobl2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aabd5eff13bde62966ca9ad2a483978e4557c55f.camel@intel.com>
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 00:15:14 +0000
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 01:09 +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Rodrigo,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 03:04:13PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 06:37:58PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > > Hi Mauro,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 09:37:22AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > WRITE_ONCE() should happen at the original var, not on a local
> > > > > copy of it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 5d36acb7198b ("drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks and pushed...
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > > >
> > > > Are you going to send it to the stable mailing list?
> > >
> > > I added cc stable while pushing and the cherry-pick to drm-intel-
> > > next-fixes
> > > has the right sha, so I'd assume this would be automagically now.
> > > But yeap, it would be good if Mauro can follow up whenever this
> > > gets
> > > to Linus tree and Greg's script start to pop up the heads-up
> > > messages.
> >
> > That's what I meant... does Mauro now need to send the e-mail
> > again for the stable?
> >
> > I thought there was some suspicion towards e-mails pushed without
> > being first sent to both stable and upstream mailing lists
> > because they can get lost or forgotten... maybe I'm wrong.
>
> It doesn't help to send now to stable ml because it can only be merged
> there after it reaches the Linus' master tree.
> Right now with the right fixes and cc:stable it should be automatically
> and he shouldn't worry.
> But in case he notices that the first patch got in but the second
> didn't then it is when we send the patch directly to the stable ml.
I sent a heads-up to Greg to warn him about the issue. I'll keep my eyes
on the -stable automatic e-mails to double-check that they'll both be
merged altogether.
Thanks!
Mauro
>
>
> >
> > Andi
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rodrigo.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Andi
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-04 7:37 [PATCH v3 0/3] Move TLB invalidation code for its own file and document it Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-08-04 7:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915: pass a pointer for tlb seqno at vma_invalidate_tlb() Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-08-04 8:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-08-08 16:37 ` Andi Shyti
2022-08-08 19:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2022-08-08 23:09 ` Andi Shyti
2022-08-09 0:15 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2022-08-09 6:29 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2022-08-04 7:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/gt: Move TLB invalidation to its own file Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-08-04 7:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915/gt: document TLB cache invalidation functions Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-08-04 19:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-08-05 9:08 ` Andi Shyti
2022-08-05 9:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-08-05 10:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2022-08-08 16:58 ` Andi Shyti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220809082922.2dbd6c0c@maurocar-mobl2 \
--to=mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.cheng@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).