From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58686C19F2D for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 06:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D438B8DE36; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 06:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F978D6E3; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 06:29:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1660026569; x=1691562569; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vyIFmtqAbHdY0idNmSeJSH07tqTNSFTVNWQhsfMsQAg=; b=ki4xM2MhGMrFBceDfKbY940f6y1ANI2uQBgvS8MU+sNICQ0/z4AstcZI z3ue3A0xce9+fz1jaojJoa1LKA3xzpc4DjmAopTMI5JKZDygmlw5nOMLO NNjKMhSN+vQjX/OTV1Rt8L1guTDw0lsUn8Heiz+wvEbZ8ziZ7vuB67UPW 20Y/QnhSqAK/r+PmdGW7UTh+qupycb/7MJtuaa0zZCT1YBYLkY3e0Lclw a1LjMK75psCDg5mRw5MUgrKGz3EdHPhgd2BuNWAZe04AgSXsXuVhZBW4e 2dSPNBXl3z+/qTrNnlHKnUOUYvfxPW88sSGgIWXdEbw5x9a+Qbg0tRIn4 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10433"; a="271151304" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,223,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="271151304" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Aug 2022 23:29:28 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,223,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="664306799" Received: from maurocar-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO maurocar-mobl2) ([10.252.48.55]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Aug 2022 23:29:25 -0700 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:29:22 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: "Vivi, Rodrigo" Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915: pass a pointer for tlb seqno at vma_invalidate_tlb() Message-ID: <20220809082922.2dbd6c0c@maurocar-mobl2> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com" , "Cheng, Michael" , "airlied@linux.ie" , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , "De Marchi, Lucas" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Wilson, Chris P" , "andi.shyti@linux.intel.com" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "Auld, Matthew" Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 00:15:14 +0000 "Vivi, Rodrigo" wrote: > On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 01:09 +0200, Andi Shyti wrote: > > Hi Rodrigo, > > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 03:04:13PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 06:37:58PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > > Hi Mauro, > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 09:37:22AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > > > wrote: > > > > > WRITE_ONCE() should happen at the original var, not on a local > > > > > copy of it. > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 5d36acb7198b ("drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti > > > > > > Thanks and pushed... > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Are you going to send it to the stable mailing list? > > > > > > I added cc stable while pushing and the cherry-pick to drm-intel- > > > next-fixes > > > has the right sha, so I'd assume this would be automagically now. > > > But yeap, it would be good if Mauro can follow up whenever this > > > gets > > > to Linus tree and Greg's script start to pop up the heads-up > > > messages. > > > > That's what I meant... does Mauro now need to send the e-mail > > again for the stable? > > > > I thought there was some suspicion towards e-mails pushed without > > being first sent to both stable and upstream mailing lists > > because they can get lost or forgotten... maybe I'm wrong. > > It doesn't help to send now to stable ml because it can only be merged > there after it reaches the Linus' master tree. > Right now with the right fixes and cc:stable it should be automatically > and he shouldn't worry. > But in case he notices that the first patch got in but the second > didn't then it is when we send the patch directly to the stable ml. I sent a heads-up to Greg to warn him about the issue. I'll keep my eyes on the -stable automatic e-mails to double-check that they'll both be merged altogether. Thanks! Mauro > > > > > > Andi > > > > > Thanks, > > > Rodrigo. > > > > > > > > > > > Andi >