From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE0EC54FB9 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C89810E39C; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e5ab]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23A8F10E39C for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEA596602F20; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:19:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1700479186; bh=9Gwt+Qw+/yGw48nLIGTTalAMKfLuy5O3oivlggeeOJc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WKW8Ft04Mf+mcif9h+B4Gbv7Uv1AnLixSwzYD400y1F9obOi4Cjy4mwF5bbTtRVMG LSkNVjwKcBAOjA+YTEv57Y8yHAbfSUAuOXNxDPdMMrmfKNcxEAks/mSiXO7HRocI0l uclMX9uo8I4qR3VFGwrkxXdPaW4Vqc404FxlWOBLZoMhCiD9wWxmvvfFobDlOhKzQG V6VmLfpEo9LmSpUnniS8zzMNilnX0J9CXXhRtVZiQcJXpG2fWiJMWO1ac3fglBCJ8n f47mDePdZ+xgN0lJnnZJRDGxtLSx9KdTtxipKdu1Uyx8/pXQJCo5HbSAgyTibvPL6I IatXnRx2n+4Rg== Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 12:19:42 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 11/26] drm/shmem-helper: Prepare drm_gem_shmem_free() to shrinker addition Message-ID: <20231120121942.4eef9e03@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20231029230205.93277-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> <20231029230205.93277-12-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> <20231110111601.5d6bd1ab@collabora.com> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel@collabora.com, Thomas Zimmermann , Emma Anholt , Christian =?UTF-8?B?S8O2bmln?= , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , Gurchetan Singh , Melissa Wen , Gerd Hoffmann , Steven Price , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Qiang Yu Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 14:02:29 +0300 Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > On 11/10/23 13:16, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 02:01:50 +0300 > > Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > > > >> Prepare drm_gem_shmem_free() to addition of memory shrinker support > >> to drm-shmem by adding and using variant of put_pages() that doesn't > >> touch reservation lock. Reservation shouldn't be touched because lockdep > >> will trigger a bogus warning about locking contention with fs_reclaim > >> code paths that can't happen during the time when GEM is freed and > >> lockdep doesn't know about that. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 35 +++++++++++++------------- > >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c > >> index 08b5a57c59d8..24ff2b99e75b 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c > >> @@ -128,6 +128,22 @@ struct drm_gem_shmem_object *drm_gem_shmem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t > >> } > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gem_shmem_create); > >> > >> +static void > >> +drm_gem_shmem_free_pages(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem) > >> +{ > >> + struct drm_gem_object *obj = &shmem->base; > >> + > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 > >> + if (shmem->map_wc) > >> + set_pages_array_wb(shmem->pages, obj->size >> PAGE_SHIFT); > >> +#endif > >> + > >> + drm_gem_put_pages(obj, shmem->pages, > >> + shmem->pages_mark_dirty_on_put, > >> + shmem->pages_mark_accessed_on_put); > >> + shmem->pages = NULL; > >> +} > >> + > >> /** > >> * drm_gem_shmem_free - Free resources associated with a shmem GEM object > >> * @shmem: shmem GEM object to free > >> @@ -142,8 +158,6 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem) > >> if (obj->import_attach) { > >> drm_prime_gem_destroy(obj, shmem->sgt); > >> } else { > >> - dma_resv_lock(shmem->base.resv, NULL); > >> - > >> drm_WARN_ON(obj->dev, refcount_read(&shmem->vmap_use_count)); > >> > >> if (shmem->sgt) { > >> @@ -157,8 +171,6 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem) > >> > > If you drop the dma_resv_lock/unlock(), you should also replace the > > drm_gem_shmem_put_pages_locked() by a drm_gem_shmem_free_pages() in this > > commit. > > drm_gem_shmem_put_pages_locked() is exported by a later patch of this > series, it's not worthwhile to remove this function I'm not talking about removing drm_gem_shmem_put_pages_locked(), but replacing the drm_gem_shmem_put_pages_locked() call you have in drm_gem_shmem_free() by a drm_gem_shmem_free_pages(), so you don't end up with a lockdep warning when you stop exactly here in the patch series, which is important if we want to keep things bisectable.