[PATCH RFC 12/32] drm/meson: dsi: remove unneeded DSI device check

[Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>]

This check is not really needed: there is no reason the detaching client
can be different from the attached one. Should this happen, that would be a
bug elsewhere.

Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>

---

**NOTE**: I'm not 100% sure this is correct, but it appears so, and other
drivers have no such check. And anyway it appears that such a check should
belong to the core, not to individual drivers. Comments welcome!

To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_mipi_dsi.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_mipi_dsi.c
index 66c73c512b0e68ff0e9dbbfaba5f8bf2d347e6b1..4dc726cef5455075def7927a469ae23020ebfec7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_mipi_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_mipi_dsi.c
@@ -252,11 +252,6 @@ static int meson_dw_mipi_dsi_host_detach(void *priv_data,
 {
 	struct meson_dw_mipi_dsi *mipi_dsi = priv_data;
 
-	if (device == mipi_dsi->dsi_device)
-		mipi_dsi->dsi_device = NULL;
-	else
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	return phy_exit(mipi_dsi->phy);
 }
 

-- 
2.49.0