From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9336FCCD1AF for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBD310E0D6; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="pbxPVS6j"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 581D610E0D6 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (87-94-110-32.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.94.110.32]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id C4FF76F9; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 20:43:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1761072211; bh=aH/M0s0TmS9qF38cCeaZcFrAvocjovEuJFK7OoMK6O0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pbxPVS6jQ0rfLjSiePkJXl7XPQyVFWALWQfImlL7BQCI1oQv5EOfFNx5wQHlexnML BM2cLy2b5d5RAXqNOCSN3Q/hrJG1W25LjZl+iHY38y0Cv8GmmhOXSG4fQdk8y7XSZY 17gkCqffNUtPEskzn2WlQWCgJNBpSy2GBlsTsFqU= Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 21:45:02 +0300 From: Laurent Pinchart To: "Lad, Prabhakar" Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Tomi Valkeinen , Biju Das , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Magnus Damm , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Fabrizio Castro , Lad Prabhakar Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/7] Add support for DU/DSI clocks and DSI driver support for the Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC Message-ID: <20251021184502.GD19043@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20251015192611.241920-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 07:26:49PM +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:26 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > Hi Prabhakar et al, > > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 at 21:26, Prabhakar wrote: > > > This patch series adds DU/DSI clocks and provides support for the > > > MIPI DSI interface on the RZ/V2H(P) SoC. > > > > > > v10->v11: > > > - Split CPG_PLL_CLK1_K/M/PDIV macro change into separate patch > > > - Updated rzv2h_cpg_plldsi_div_determine_rate() > > > while iterating over the divider table > > > - Added Acked-by tag from Tomi for patch 2/7 and 3/7 > > > - Added Reviewed-by tag from Geert for patch 2/7 and 3/7 > > > > I think this series is ready for merging. > > \o/ > > > > Lad Prabhakar (7): > > > clk: renesas: rzv2h-cpg: Add instance field to struct pll > > > clk: renesas: rzv2h-cpg: Use GENMASK for PLL fields > > > clk: renesas: rzv2h-cpg: Add support for DSI clocks > > > clk: renesas: r9a09g057: Add clock and reset entries for DSI and LCDC > > > dt-bindings: display: bridge: renesas,dsi: Document RZ/V2H(P) and > > > RZ/V2N > > > drm: renesas: rz-du: mipi_dsi: Add LPCLK clock support > > > drm: renesas: rz-du: mipi_dsi: Add support for RZ/V2H(P) SoC > > > > As this touches both clk and drm, let's discuss the merge strategy. > > My proposal: > > 1. I queue patches 1-3 in an immutable branch with a signed tag, > > to be used as a base for the remaining patches, > > 2. I queue patch 4 on top of 1 in renesas-clk for v6.19, > > 3. The DRM people queue patches 5-7 on top of 1. > > > > Does that sound fine for you? > Sounds good to me. > > Biju/Tomi, are you OK with the above? The plan seems good to me. Note that you won't be able to push this yourself to drm-misc as committers are limited to pushing linear branches. We need an ack from the drm-misc maintainers, and one of them will need to merge the branch (either branch 1. as prepared by Geert, on top of which you can them push patches 5-7 yourself, or a branch you'll prepare on top of 1. with patches 5-7). -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart