From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
phasta@mailbox.org, matthew.brost@intel.com,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal v2
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2026 23:28:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202602212322.qKZcoRK3-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219160822.1529-3-christian.koenig@amd.com>
Hi Christian,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-misc/drm-misc-next]
[cannot apply to drm-i915/for-linux-next drm-i915/for-linux-next-fixes drm-xe/drm-xe-next linus/master v6.19 next-20260220]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-K-nig/dma-buf-detach-fence-ops-on-signal-v2/20260220-010804
base: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel.git drm-misc-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260219160822.1529-3-christian.koenig%40amd.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/8] dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal v2
config: hexagon-randconfig-r121-20260221 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260221/202602212322.qKZcoRK3-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 23.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project e86750b29fa0ff207cd43213d66dabe565417638)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260221/202602212322.qKZcoRK3-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602212322.qKZcoRK3-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:1051:38: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected char const [noderef] __rcu *timeline @@ got char * @@
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:1051:38: sparse: expected char const [noderef] __rcu *timeline
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:1051:38: sparse: got char *
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:1052:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected char const [noderef] __rcu *driver @@ got char * @@
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:1052:36: sparse: expected char const [noderef] __rcu *driver
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:1052:36: sparse: got char *
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c: note: in included file (through include/trace/trace_events.h, include/trace/define_trace.h, include/trace/events/dma_fence.h):
include/trace/events/dma_fence.h:17:1: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
include/trace/events/dma_fence.h:17:1: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
include/trace/events/dma_fence.h:17:1: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
include/trace/events/dma_fence.h:17:1: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
include/trace/events/dma_fence.h:17:1: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
include/trace/events/dma_fence.h:17:1: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:379:19: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:379:43: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
vim +379 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
345
346
347 /**
348 * dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked - signal completion of a fence
349 * @fence: the fence to signal
350 * @timestamp: fence signal timestamp in kernel's CLOCK_MONOTONIC time domain
351 *
352 * Signal completion for software callbacks on a fence, this will unblock
353 * dma_fence_wait() calls and run all the callbacks added with
354 * dma_fence_add_callback(). Can be called multiple times, but since a fence
355 * can only go from the unsignaled to the signaled state and not back, it will
356 * only be effective the first time. Set the timestamp provided as the fence
357 * signal timestamp.
358 *
359 * Unlike dma_fence_signal_timestamp(), this function must be called with
360 * &dma_fence.lock held.
361 */
362 void dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked(struct dma_fence *fence,
363 ktime_t timestamp)
364 {
365 struct dma_fence_cb *cur, *tmp;
366 struct list_head cb_list;
367
368 lockdep_assert_held(fence->lock);
369
370 if (unlikely(test_and_set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
371 &fence->flags)))
372 return;
373
374 /*
375 * When neither a release nor a wait operation is specified set the ops
376 * pointer to NULL to allow the fence structure to become independent
377 * from who originally issued it.
378 */
> 379 if (!fence->ops->release && !fence->ops->wait)
380 RCU_INIT_POINTER(fence->ops, NULL);
381
382 /* Stash the cb_list before replacing it with the timestamp */
383 list_replace(&fence->cb_list, &cb_list);
384
385 fence->timestamp = timestamp;
386 set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT, &fence->flags);
387 trace_dma_fence_signaled(fence);
388
389 list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, tmp, &cb_list, node) {
390 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cur->node);
391 cur->func(fence, cur);
392 }
393 }
394 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked);
395
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-21 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260219160822.1529-1-christian.koenig@amd.com>
2026-02-19 16:07 ` [PATCH 1/8] dma-buf: protected fence ops by RCU v7 Christian König
2026-02-21 14:15 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-21 14:26 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-19 16:07 ` [PATCH 2/8] dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal v2 Christian König
2026-02-21 15:28 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-02-19 16:07 ` [PATCH 3/8] dma-buf: abstract fence locking v2 Christian König
2026-02-19 16:07 ` [PATCH 4/8] dma-buf: inline spinlock for fence protection v5 Christian König
2026-02-19 16:07 ` [PATCH 5/8] dma-buf/selftests: test RCU ops and inline lock v2 Christian König
2026-02-19 16:07 ` [PATCH 6/8] dma-buf: use inline lock for the stub fence v2 Christian König
2026-02-19 16:07 ` [PATCH 7/8] dma-buf: use inline lock for the dma-fence-array Christian König
2026-02-19 16:07 ` [PATCH 8/8] dma-buf: use inline lock for the dma-fence-chain Christian König
2026-02-10 10:01 Independence for dma_fences! v7 Christian König
2026-02-10 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal v2 Christian König
2026-02-13 14:22 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-02-19 12:52 ` Christian König
2026-02-19 15:49 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202602212322.qKZcoRK3-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phasta@mailbox.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox