From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: ZhaoJinming <zhaojinming@uniontech.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] accel/rocket: Fix fence leak, runtime PM leak and WARN in rocket_job_run() error paths
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:38:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608103845.6F4AB1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608100040.985526-1-zhaojinming@uniontech.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] IOMMU group reference leak in rocket_job_handle_irq()
- [High] Unsafe hardware register access in shared IRQ handler while runtime suspended
--
commit fca53bbe333680ce9d4e0368b39e684506994081
Author: ZhaoJinming <zhaojinming@uniontech.com>
Subject: accel/rocket: Fix fence leak, runtime PM leak and WARN in rocket_job_run() error paths
This commit fixes multiple resource leaks in the error paths of rocket_job_run().
It replaces pm_runtime_get_sync() with pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to handle
the usage counter, correctly releases dma_fence references on failure, and
adds pm_runtime_put() during IOMMU attachment failures.
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
> index 2f1861f960ccb..cf9f61682dd8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_job.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -310,13 +310,22 @@ static struct dma_fence *rocket_job_run(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job)
> dma_fence_put(job->done_fence);
> job->done_fence = dma_fence_get(fence);
>
> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(core->dev);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return fence;
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(core->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dma_fence_put(job->done_fence);
> + job->done_fence = NULL;
> + dma_fence_put(fence);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
>
> ret = iommu_attach_group(job->domain->domain, core->iommu_group);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return fence;
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pm_runtime_put(core->dev);
> + dma_fence_put(job->done_fence);
> + job->done_fence = NULL;
> + dma_fence_put(fence);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
>
> scoped_guard(mutex, &core->job_lock) {
> core->in_flight_job = job;
[ ... ]
> static void rocket_job_handle_irq(struct rocket_core *core)
> {
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(core->dev);
>
> rocket_pc_writel(core, OPERATION_ENABLE, 0x0);
> rocket_pc_writel(core, INTERRUPT_CLEAR, 0x1ffff);
>
> scoped_guard(mutex, &core->job_lock)
> if (core->in_flight_job) {
> if (core->in_flight_job->next_task_idx < core->in_flight_job->task_count) {
> rocket_job_hw_submit(core, core->in_flight_job);
> return;
> }
>
> iommu_detach_group(NULL, iommu_group_get(core->dev));
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this leak an IOMMU
group reference?
It looks like iommu_group_get() increments the kobject reference count for the
group. However, iommu_detach_group() doesn't consume this reference, and there
is no subsequent iommu_group_put() call.
Since this runs on every completed job, could this eventually overflow the
reference counter and prevent the group from being freed?
[ ... ]
> static irqreturn_t rocket_job_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> {
> struct rocket_core *core = data;
> u32 raw_status = rocket_pc_readl(core, INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it safe to access hardware registers
here without first checking if the device is active?
Since the driver registers this as a shared interrupt handler, it could be
invoked if another device on the same IRQ line triggers an interrupt while the
NPU device is runtime suspended.
Reading from a powered-down device typically returns 0xffffffff, which would
spuriously trigger the WARN_ON macros below and falsely return
IRQ_WAKE_THREAD.
Should this use pm_runtime_get_if_active() to verify the device is powered
before reading INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS?
>
> WARN_ON(raw_status & PC_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_DMA_READ_ERROR);
> WARN_ON(raw_status & PC_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_DMA_WRITE_ERROR);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608100040.985526-1-zhaojinming@uniontech.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 8:38 [PATCH] accel/rocket: Fix dma_fence reference leak on error paths in rocket_job_run() ZhaoJinming
2026-06-08 8:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 10:00 ` [PATCH v2] accel/rocket: Fix fence leak, runtime PM leak and WARN in rocket_job_run() error paths ZhaoJinming
2026-06-08 10:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 9:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] accel/rocket: Fix error path handling in rocket_job_run() ZhaoJinming
2026-06-09 9:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] accel/rocket: Fix iommu_group leak and unsafe IRQ register access ZhaoJinming
2026-06-09 9:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 3:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] accel/rocket: Fix error path handling in rocket_job_run() ZhaoJinming
2026-06-10 3:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] accel/rocket: Fix iommu_group leak and unsafe IRQ register access ZhaoJinming
2026-06-10 3:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 3:25 ` 赵金明
2026-06-10 6:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] accel/rocket: Fix error path handling in rocket_job_run() ZhaoJinming
2026-06-10 6:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] accel/rocket: Fix iommu_group leak and unsafe IRQ register access ZhaoJinming
2026-06-10 6:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 7:08 ` 赵金明
2026-06-10 7:10 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] accel/rocket: Fix error path handling in rocket_job_run() ZhaoJinming
2026-06-10 7:10 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] accel/rocket: Fix iommu_group leak and unsafe IRQ register access ZhaoJinming
2026-06-10 7:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 7:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] accel/rocket: Fix error path handling in rocket_job_run() sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 17:55 ` Nicolas Dufresne
2026-06-12 9:03 ` 赵金明
2026-06-10 3:19 ` [PATCH v4 " sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 9:50 ` [PATCH v3 " sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608103845.6F4AB1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zhaojinming@uniontech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox